Loving and knowing: reflections for an engaged epistemology

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20 (5):847-870 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In search of our highest capacities, cognitive scientists aim to explain things like mathematics, language, and planning. But are these really our most sophisticated forms of knowing? In this paper, I point to a different pinnacle of cognition. Our most sophisticated human knowing, I think, lies in how we engage with each other, in our relating. Cognitive science and philosophy of mind have largely ignored the ways of knowing at play here. At the same time, the emphasis on discrete, rational knowing to the detriment of engaged, human knowing pervades societal practices and institutions, often with harmful effects on people and their relations. There are many reasons why we need a new, engaged—or even engaging—epistemology of human knowing. The enactive theory of participatory sense-making takes steps towards this, but it needs deepening. Kym Maclaren’s idea of letting be invites such a deepening. Characterizing knowing as a relationship of letting be provides a nuanced way to deal with the tensions between the knower’s being and the being of the known, as they meet in the process of knowing-and-being-known. This meeting of knower and known is not easy to understand. However, there is a mode of relating in which we know it well, and that is: in loving relationships. I propose to look at human knowing through the lens of loving. We then see that both knowing and loving are existential, dialectic ways in which concrete and particular beings engage with each other.

Similar books and articles

Knowing-that, Knowing-how, or Knowing-to?Yong Huang - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Research 42:65-94.
An Analysis of Knowing. [REVIEW]F. T. R. - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (2):324-324.
Knowing‐Wh and Embedded Questions.Ted Parent - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (2):81-95.
The metaepistemology of knowing-how.Cheng-Hung Tsai - 2011 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):541-556.
Knowing How.Yuri Cath - 2019 - Analysis 79 (3):487-503.
Knowing-that, knowing-how, and knowing philosophically.Stephen Hetherington - 2008 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):307-324.
Knowing as Acting: Examples from Confucianism and Buddhism.Qiong Wang - 2016 - Dialogue and Universalism 26 (4):201-213.
Knowing How, Knowing That, Knowing Technology.Per Norström - 2015 - Philosophy and Technology 28 (4):553-565.
Between Knowing How and Knowing That.Carlo Penco - 2014 - Liber Amicorum Pascal Engel.
Two Senses of "Knowing".Richard Schmitt - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 18 (4):657 - 677.
Knowing and Valuing Fairness.J. M. Hinton - 1990 - Philosophy 65 (253):271 - 296.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-20

Downloads
577 (#16,827)

6 months
113 (#6,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hanne De Jaegher
University of the Basque Country

Citations of this work

Love In-Between.Laura Candiotto & Hanne De Jaegher - 2021 - The Journal of Ethics 25 (4):501-524.
Enactive becoming.Ezequiel A. Di Paolo - 2021 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20 (5):783-809.
Embodied ethics: Levinas’ gift for enactivism.Fabrice Métais & Mario Villalobos - 2021 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20 (1):169-190.
An Enactive-Ecological Approach to Information and Uncertainty.Eros Moreira de Carvalho & Giovanni Rolla - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11 (Enaction and Ecological Psycholo):1-11.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations