Zeno's paradoxes and the cosmological argument

Abstract
I SHOW THAT THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT OF AQUINAS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD COMMITS A RATHER TRIVIAL LINGUISTIC FALLACY, BY SHOWING THAT (1) SOME OF ZENO'S PARADOXES COMMIT A TRIVIAL LINGUISTIC FALLACY, AND THAT (2) THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT IS SUFFICIENTLY SIMILAR TO THESE PARADOXES THAT IT COMMITS THE SAME FALLACY. COPLESTON'S VIEW THAT "MENTION OF THE MATHEMATICAL INFINITE SERIES IS IRRELEVANT" TO "ANY" OF AQUINAS'S ARGUMENTS FOR GOD'S EXISTENCE IS THUS SHOWN FALSE
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00136967
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Zeno's Paradoxes.Wesley C. Salmon (ed.) - 1970 - Bobbs-Merrill.
Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes of Motion.Adolf Grünbaum - 1970 - In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 200--250.
Modern Science and the Refutation of the Paradoxes of Zeno.Adolf Grünbaum - 1955 - In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 164--175.
What the Liar Taught Achilles.Gary Mar & Paul St Denis - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):29-46.
Zeno's Paradoxes.Nicholas Huggett - forthcoming - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (Ed.).
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
167 ( #28,907 of 2,202,679 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,061 of 2,202,679 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature