More Autonomous or more Fenced-in? Neuroscientific Instruments and Intervention in Criminal Justice

Neuroethics:1-12 (forthcoming)
Abstract
Neuroscientific research in relation to antisocial behavior has strongly grown in the last decades. This has resulted in a better understanding of biological factors associated with antisocial behavior. Furthermore several neuroscientific instruments and interventions have been developed that have a relatively low threshold for use in the criminal justice system to contribute to prevention or reduction of antisocial and criminal behavior. When considering implementation in the criminal justice system, ethical aspects of the use of neuroscientific instruments and interventions need to be taken into account. With respect to ethics in relation to neurocriminology much of the literature focuses on identifying and debating risks and value conflicts. This is important and necessary, but the positive contribution of neuroscientific applications may therefore get less attention in the ethical literature. Yet, ethicists can help criminal justice researchers and practitioners to identify ways in which neuroscience could add positively to important values in offender rehabilitation. It is argued that this role of ethicists in interdisciplinary teams deserves more emphasis. As an illustration, this contribution focuses on how neuroscientific knowledge, instruments and interventions may contribute to autonomy of offenders.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-018-9384-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,373
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Review Essay / Dominion as the Target of Criminal Justice.C. L. ten - 1991 - Criminal Justice Ethics 10 (2):40-46.
Review Essay / A Theory of Criminal Justice.Barbara Baum Levenbook - 1982 - Criminal Justice Ethics 1 (2):60-64.
The Dangerous Ideal of Autonomy.John Kekes - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (2):192-204.
Finding Space for Criminal Prosecutions Post‐Conflict.Jovana Davidovic - 2015 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (1):53-68.
The Who and the Why of Humanitarian Intervention.Steven Lee - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):302-308.
Criminal Justice and the Liberal Polity.Jonathan Jacobs - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (2):173-191.
Revenge, Victim’s Rights, and Criminal Justice.Michael Davis - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):119-128.
Review Essay / Mental Illness and Criminal Justice.Jerome Neu - 1984 - Criminal Justice Ethics 3 (2):62-67.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-14

Total downloads
1 ( #1,035,254 of 2,266,845 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #372,714 of 2,266,845 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature