Memory enhancing drugs and Alzheimer’s Disease: Enhancing the self or preventing the loss of it? [Book Review]

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (2):141-151 (2007)

Abstract
In this paper we analyse some ethical and philosophical questions related to the development of memory enhancing drugs (MEDs) and anti-dementia drugs. The world of memory enhancement is coloured by utopian thinking and by the desire for quicker, sharper, and more reliable memories. Dementia is characterized by decline, fragility, vulnerability, a loss of the most important cognitive functions and even a loss of self. While MEDs are being developed for self-improvement, in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) the self is being lost. Despite this it is precisely those patients with AD and other forms of dementia that provide the subjects for scientific research on memory improvement. Biomedical research in the field of MEDs and anti-dementia drugs appears to provide a strong impetus for rethinking what we mean by ‘memory’, ‘enhancement’, ‘therapy’, and ‘self’. We conclude (1) that the enhancement of memory is still in its infancy, (2) that current MEDs and anti-dementia drugs are at best partially and minimally effective under specific conditions, (3) that ‘memory᾿and ‘enhancement᾿are ambiguous terms, (4) that there is no clear-cut distinction between enhancement and therapy, and (5) that the research into MEDs and anti-dementia drugs encourages a reductionistic view of the human mind and of the self
Keywords memory enhancing drugs  dementia  Alzheimer’s Disease  the self  neuroethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-007-9055-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,122
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Oneself as Another.Paul RICOEUR - 1992 - University of Chicago Press.
Oneself as Another.Paul Ricoeur & Kathleen Blamey - 1992 - Religious Studies 30 (3):368-371.
The Seven Sins of Memory: Implications for Science and Society.S. Schacter - forthcoming - Neuroethics: Mapping the Field. Dana Foundation, San Fransisco.
Neuroethics: The Practical and the Philosophical.Martha J. Farah - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (1):34-40.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Psychopharmacology and the Self: An Introduction to the Theme. [REVIEW]Fredrik Svenaeus - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (2):115-117.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Burden of Dementia: A Medical and Research Perspective.Piero Antuono & Jan Beyer - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):3-13.
Cognitive Enhancement, Cheating, and Accomplishment.Rob Goodman - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (2):pp. 145-160.
Give Memory-Altering Drugs a Chance.Adam Kolber - 2011 - Nature 475 (7360):275-276.
Psychopharmacological Enhancement.Walter Glannon - 2008 - Neuroethics 1 (1):45-54.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
43 ( #210,513 of 2,289,285 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #61,512 of 2,289,285 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature