Predictive Sentencing: Normative and Empirical Perspectives

Hart Publishing (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Predictive Sentencing addresses the role of risk assessment in contemporary sentencing practices. Predictive sentencing has become so deeply ingrained in Western criminal justice decision-making that despite early ethical discussions about selective incapacitation, it currently attracts little critique. Nor has it been subjected to a thorough normative and empirical scrutiny. This is problematic since much current policy and practice concerning risk predictions is inconsistent with mainstream theories of punishment. Moreover, predictive sentencing exacerbates discrimination and disparity in sentencing. Although structured risk assessments may have replaced 'gut feelings', and have now been systematically implemented in Western justice systems, the fundamental issues and questions that surround the use of risk assessment instruments at sentencing remain unresolved. This volume critically evaluates these issues and will be of great interest to scholars of criminal justice and criminology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Preventive Detention Morally Worse than Quarantine?Thomas Douglas - 2019 - In Jan W. De Keijser, Julian Roberts & Jesper Ryberg (eds.), Predictive Sentencing: Normative and Empirical Perspectives. London: Hart Publishing.
Sentencing Multiple Crimes.Jesper Ryberg, Julian V. Roberts & Jan Willem de Keijser (eds.) - 2017 - New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
The ethics of sentencing white-collar criminals.Phillip Balsmeier & Jennifer Kelly - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (2):143 - 152.
Back-End Sentencing: A Practice in Search of a Rationale.Jeremy Travis - 2007 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 74:631-644.
Empirical Ethics.Carlo Leget & Pascal Borry - 2010 - Ethical Perspectives 17 (2):231-252.
Back-end sentencing: A practice in search of a rationale.Jeremy Travis - 2007 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 74 (2):631-644.
On the Relationship between Normative Claims and Empirical Realities in Immigration.Joseph H. Carens - 2019 - Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop “Studying Migration Policies at the Interface Between Empirical Research and Normative Analysisandquot;.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-08

Downloads
20 (#769,678)

6 months
5 (#644,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Julian Roberts
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

Three Rationales for a Legal Right to Mental Integrity.Thomas Douglas & Lisa Forsberg - 2021 - In S. Ligthart, D. van Toor, T. Kooijmans, T. Douglas & G. Meynen (eds.), Neurolaw: Advances in Neuroscience, Justice and Security. Palgrave Macmillan.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references