Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):197-198 (2000)

Authors
Craig DeLancey
State University of New York at Oswego
Abstract
I express two concerns with the theory of emotion that Rolls provides: (1) rewards and punishers alone fail to explain the basic emotions; (2) Rolls needs to clarify his notion of the intentionality of emotions. I also criticize his theory of consciousness, arguing that it fails to explain qualia, and that ironically it is emotions which make this most evident.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x00282423
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,343
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
25 ( #434,515 of 2,445,373 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,131 of 2,445,373 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes