Einstein and EPR

Philosophy of Science 58 (3):377-397 (1991)

Abstract
Recent studies have shown that Einstein did not write the EPR paper and that he was disappointed with the outcome. He thought, rightly, that his own argument for the incompleteness of quantum theory was badly presented in the paper. We reconstruct the argument of EPR, indicate the reasons Einstein was dissatisfied with it, and discuss Einstein's own argument. We show that many commentators have been misled by the obscurity of EPR into proposing interpretations of its argument that do not accurately represent Einstein's own views. Finally, we evaluate Einstein's own incompleteness argument, concluding that recent experimental findings have likely shown it to be unsound
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289623
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,405
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

When Champions Meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein Debate.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (1):212-242.
Outcome Predictions and Property Attribution: The EPR Argument Reconsidered.GianCarlo Ghirardi & Renata Grassi - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (3):397-423.
When Champions Meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein Debate.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (1):212-242.
Einstein, Bell, and Nonseparable Realism.Federico Laudisa - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (3):309-329.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory.Arthur Fine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Relativity, Quantum Mechanics and EPR.Robert Clifton, Constantine Pagonis & Itamar Pitowsky - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:114 - 128.
Causal Independence in EPR Arguments.Jeremy Butterfield - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:213 - 225.
Einstein Algebras and the Hole Argument.Jonathan Bain - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1073-1085.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
180 ( #44,411 of 2,286,272 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #196,066 of 2,286,272 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature