Failure of Engineering Artifacts: A Life Cycle Approach

Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):913-944 (2013)

Failure is a central notion both in ethics of engineering and in engineering practice. Engineers devote considerable resources to assure their products will not fail and considerable progress has been made in the development of tools and methods for understanding and avoiding failure. Engineering ethics, on the other hand, is concerned with the moral and social aspects related to the causes and consequences of technological failures. But what is meant by failure, and what does it mean that a failure has occurred? The subject of this paper is how engineers use and define this notion. Although a traditional definition of failure can be identified that is shared by a large part of the engineering community, the literature shows that engineers are willing to consider as failures also events and circumstance that are at odds with this traditional definition. These cases violate one or more of three assumptions made by the traditional approach to failure. An alternative approach, inspired by the notion of product life cycle, is proposed which dispenses with these assumptions. Besides being able to address the traditional cases of failure, it can deal successfully with the problematic cases. The adoption of a life cycle perspective allows the introduction of a clearer notion of failure and allows a classification of failure phenomena that takes into account the roles of stakeholders involved in the various stages of a product life cycle
Keywords Failure  Life cycle  Failure analysis  Product development  Failure trajectory  Sustainability
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-012-9360-0
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,984
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Katrina: Macro-Ethical Issues for Engineers. [REVIEW]Byron Newberry - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (3):535-571.
Business Ethics and Doing What One Ought to Do.Gregory Mellema - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (2):149 - 153.
Rawlsian Decisionmaking and Genetic Engineering.Andrew Sneddon - 2006 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (1):35-41.
The Importance of Philosophy to Engineering.Carl Mitcham - 1998 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):27-47.
The Place of Engineering and the Engineering of Place.Gene Moriarty - 2000 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 5 (2):83-96.
Educating the Humanitarian Engineer.Kevin M. Passino - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):577-600.
Piercing the Veil: Ethical Issues in Ethnographic Research.Brian Schrag - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2):135-160.
Reference Failure and Scientific Realism: A Response to the Meta-Induction.D. Cummiskey - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1):21-40.


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #754,717 of 2,319,639 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #598,472 of 2,319,639 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature