How can contributors to open-source communities be Trusted? On the assumption, inference, and substitution of trust

Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4):327-341 (2010)
Abstract
Open-source communities that focus on content rely squarely on the contributions of invisible strangers in cyberspace. How do such communities handle the problem of trusting that strangers have good intentions and adequate competence? This question is explored in relation to communities in which such trust is a vital issue: peer production of software (FreeBSD and Mozilla in particular) and encyclopaedia entries (Wikipedia in particular). In the context of open-source software, it is argued that trust was inferred from an underlying ‘hacker ethic’, which already existed. The Wikipedian project, by contrast, had to create an appropriate ethic along the way. In the interim, the assumption simply had to be that potential contributors were trustworthy; they were granted ‘substantial trust’. Subsequently, projects from both communities introduced rules and regulations which partly substituted for the need to perceive contributors as trustworthy. They faced a design choice in the continuum between a high-discretion design (granting a large amount of trust to contributors) and a low-discretion design (leaving only a small amount of trust to contributors). It is found that open-source designs for software and encyclopaedias are likely to converge in the future towards a mid-level of discretion. In such a design the anonymous user is no longer invested with unquestioning trust.
Keywords design  discretion  FreeBSD  hacker ethic  Mozilla  open source software  trust  Wikipedia
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10676-010-9230-x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Trust and Antitrust.Annette Baier - 1986 - Ethics 96 (2):231-260.
Trust, Hope and Empowerment.Victoria McGeer - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2):237 – 254.
Trusting Virtual Trust.Paul B. de Laat - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):167-180.
The Cunning of Trust.Philip Pettit - 1995 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (3):202-225.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Evaluating Google as an Epistemic Tool.Thomas W. Simpson - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (4):426-445.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Creating Trust.Robert C. Solomon - 1998 - Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):205-232.
Trust: Self-Interest and the Common Good.Marek Kohn - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Evoking Trust in the Nutrition Counselor: Why Should We Be Trusted? [REVIEW]Jacqui Gingras - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (1):57-74.
The Decline of Trust, The Decline of Democracy?Patti Tamara Lenard - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (3):363-378.
Trust in Strangers, Trust in Friends.Jessica Miller - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):17-22.
The Institutionalization of Open Source.Robert A. Gehring - 2006 - Poiesis and Praxis 4 (1):54-73.
Trusting Virtual Trust.Paul B. de Laat - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):167-180.
Added to PP index
2010-06-12

Total downloads
41 ( #137,396 of 2,210,106 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #125,746 of 2,210,106 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature