In Jacques Berleur, Markku I. Nurminen & John Impagliazzo (eds.), IFIP; Social Informatics: An Information Society for All? In Remembrance of Rob Kling Vol 223. Springer (2006)
AbstractDuring the two last decades, speeded up by the development of the Internet, several types of commons have been opened up for intellectual resources. In this article their variety is being explored as to the kind of resources and the type of regulation involved. The open source software movement initiated the phenomenon, by creating a copyright-based commons of source code that can be labelled `dynamic': allowing both use and modification of resources. Additionally, such a commons may be either protected from appropriation (by `copyleft' licensing), or unprotected. Around the year 2000, this approach was generalized by the Creative Commons initiative. In the process they added a `static' commons, in which only use of resources is allowed. This mould was applied to the sciences and the humanities in particular, and various Open Access initiatives unfolded. A final aspect of copyright-based commons is the distinction between active and passive commons: while the latter is only a site for obtaining resources, the former is also a site for production of new resources by communities of volunteers (`peer production'). Finally, several patent commons are discussed, which mainly aim at preventing patents blocking the further development of science. Throughout, attention is drawn to interrelationships between the various commons.
Similar books and articles
Copyright or copyleft?: An analysis of property regimes for software development.Paul B. de Laat - 2005 - Research Policy 34 (10):1511-1532.
Tragedy of the Commons: The Meaning of the Metaphor.John Vandermeer - 1996 - Science and Society 60 (3):290 - 306.
Commons: A Place for No One, A Place for All.Zachary Davis - 2009 - Environment, Space, Place 1 (2):103-129.
Scientific Authorship and E-Commons.Luc Schneider - 2010 - In J. Vallverdu (ed.), Thinking Machines and the Philosophy of Computer Science: Concepts and Principles. Igi Publishing.
Ethical Obligations in a Tragedy of the Commons.Baylor L. Johnson - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (3):271-287.
Locke, intellectual property rights, and the information commons.Herman T. Tavani - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):87-97.
Genetic Engineering and the Speciation of Superions from Humans.Lucas Alexander Haley Commons-Miller, Michael Lamport Commons & Geoffrey David Commons - 2008 - World Futures 64 (5):436-443.
Collaborative Control and The Commons: Safeguarding Employee Rights.Craig P. Dunn - 1996 - Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (3):277-288.
Re-skilling the Social Practices: Open Source and Life–Towards a Commons-Based Peer Production in Agro-biotechnology?Guido Nicolosi & Guido Ruivenkamp - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1181-1200.
Global Common Resources and the Just Distribution of Emission Shares.Megan Blomfield - 2013 - Journal of Political Philosophy 21 (3):283-304.
Annette Baier, The Commons of the Mind:The Commons of the Mind.Margaret Gilbert - 1999 - Ethics 109 (4):894-897.
Review of Ostrom's Governing the Commons. [REVIEW]Walter Block - 2011 - Libertarian Papers 3.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads