Philosophy 75 (4):599-603 (2000)
Quentin Smith has been arguing for more than a decade that the universe is uncaused. For nearly as long he has also argued that it appeared spontaneously from literally nothing. I have replied to these arguments in many places, including a recent essay in Philosophy. Now, apparently, Smith has changed his mind: in his most recent contribution to Philosophy, he argues not that the universe is uncaused, but that it is self-caused. His motives for so doing remain much the same, however: he would like to undermine the efforts of theists to show that the universe requires an external cause, by arguing that the universe can cause itself (580). I do not think that the arguments he gives for this new position are any more plausible than his older ones for an uncaused universe, so I don't think that he has advanced the cause of atheism. This essay defends that evaluation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Concerning the Metaphysical Necessity of the Universe Beginning Uncaused.Quentin Smith - 2000 - Philo 3 (1):73-75.
The Hume-Edwards Objection to the Cosmological Argument.William F. Vallicella - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:423-443.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #108,077 of 2,143,562 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #386,856 of 2,143,562 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.