Meta-Ethical Agnosticism in Legal Theory: Mapping a Way Out

Abstract
In his review of Bernard Williams' Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Hart eloquently formulated an apprehension that still haunts much of contemporary jurisprudence: if the moral 'I must' has to be 'seen as coming not from outside, but from what is most deeply inside us? the fear is that this will not be enough'. I argue that this fear is the byproduct of the dualist outlook within which Hart—and a significant part of contemporary legal theory—is confined: because of his bald naturalist premise, Hart could not conceive of moral objectivity except in terms presupposing an order of Reason resolutely distinct from the 'natural' world. This paper seeks to debunk this dualist outlook by engaging with the kind of 'non-bald' naturalism advocated in different ways by both McDowell and Blackburn. In considering contemporary efforts to draw a middle way between ethical scepticism and metaphysical rationalism, the paper draws on the pragmatic elements emerging from the confrontation between Habermas and Rawls
Keywords agnosticism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5235/204033210793524267
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,621
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited.F. Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
Jeremy Bentham and HLA Hart's ‘Utilitarian Tradition in Jurisprudence’.Philip Schofield - 2010 - Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 1 (2):147-167.
Hart, Legal Rules and Palm Tree Justice.Wilfrid J. Waluchow - 1985 - Law and Philosophy 4 (1):41 - 70.
Levinasian Ethics and Legal Obligation.Jonathan Crowe - 2006 - Ratio Juris 19 (4):421-433.
Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism: Dworkin and Hegel on Legal Theory.Thom Brooks - 2007 - Georgia State University Law Review 23 (3):513-60.
In Defense of Hart.Matthew H. Kramer - 2013 - In Wil Waluchow & Stefan Sciaraffa (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. Oxford University Press. pp. 22.
Defending Semantic Generalism.Daniel Whiting - 2007 - Analysis 67 (296):303–311.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-11-29

Total downloads

26 ( #195,843 of 2,169,066 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #346,364 of 2,169,066 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums