Open Source Production of Encyclopedias: Editorial Policies at the Intersection of Organizational and Epistemological Trust
Social Epistemology 26 (1):71-103 (2012)
The ideas behind open source software are currently applied to the production of encyclopedias. A sample of six English text-based, neutral-point-of-view, online encyclopedias of the kind are identified: h2g2, Wikipedia, Scholarpedia, Encyclopedia of Earth, Citizendium and Knol. How do these projects deal with the problem of trusting their participants to behave as competent and loyal encyclopedists? Editorial policies for soliciting and processing content are shown to range from high discretion to low discretion; that is, from granting unlimited trust to limited trust. Their conceptions of the proper role for experts are also explored and it is argued that to a great extent they determine editorial policies. Subsequently, internal discussions about quality guarantee at Wikipedia are rendered. All indications are that review and ?super-review? of new edits will become policy, to be performed by Wikipedians with a better reputation. Finally, while for encyclopedias the issue of organizational trust largely coincides with epistemological trust, a link is made with theories about the acceptance of testimony. It is argued that both non-reductionist views (the ?acceptance principle? and the ?assurance view?) and reductionist ones (an appeal to background conditions, and a?newly defined??expertise view?) have been implemented in editorial strategies over the past decade
|Keywords||encyclopedia open source testimony trust Wikipedia|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England.Steven Shapin - 1995 - University of Chicago Press.
The Entanglement of Trust and Knowledge on the Web.Judith Simon - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 2010 (12):343-355.
Citations of this work BETA
Trustworthiness and Truth: The Epistemic Pitfalls of Internet Accountability.Karen Frost-Arnold - 2014 - Episteme 11 (1):63-81.
From Open-Source Software to Wikipedia: ‘Backgrounding’ Trust by Collective Monitoring and Reputation Tracking.Paul B. de Laat - 2014 - Ethics and Information Technology 16 (2):157-169.
Coercion or Empowerment? Moderation of Content in Wikipedia as 'Essentially Contested' Bureaucratic Rules.Paul B. de Laat - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (2):123-135.
Similar books and articles
How Can Contributors to Open-Source Communities Be Trusted? On the Assumption, Inference, and Substitution of Trust.Paul B. de Laat - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4):327-341.
Epistemology and the Wikipedia.P. D. Magnus - 2006 - North American Computing and Philosophy Conference.
Building Organizational Trust with Ethical Organizational Practices.Raminta Pučėtaitė & Anna-Maija Lämsä - 2008 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:55-64.
Can Trust Itself Ground a Reason to Believe the Trusted?Edward Hinchman - 2012 - Abstracta Special Issues 6 (Special Issue VI):47-83.
The Case of Online Trust.Matteo Turilli, Mariarosaria Taddeo & Antonino Vaccaro - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (3-4):333-345.
Added to index2011-12-04
Total downloads946 ( #815 of 2,171,798 )
Recent downloads (6 months)115 ( #1,005 of 2,171,798 )
How can I increase my downloads?