Dissertation, University of Kansas (2016)

Jeremy C. DeLong
Fort Hays State University
The primary interpretative challenge for understanding Parmenides’ poem revolves around explaining both the meaning of, and the relationship between, its two primary sections: a) the positively endorsed metaphysical arguments which describe some unified, unchanging, motionless, and eternal “reality”, and b) the ensuing cosmology, which incorporates the very principles explicitly denied in Aletheia. I will refer to this problem as the “A-D Paradox.” I advocate resolving this paradoxical relationship by reading Parmenides’ poem as a ring-composition, and incorporating a modified version of Palmer’s modal interpretation of Aletheia. On my interpretation, Parmenides’ thesis in Aletheia is not a counter-intuitive description of how all the world must truly be, but rather a radical rethinking of divine nature. Understanding Aletheia in this way, the ensuing “cosmology” can be straightforwardly rejected as an exposition of how traditional, mythopoetic accounts have misled mortals in their understanding of divinity. Not only does this interpretative view provide a resolution to the A-D Paradox, it offers a more holistic account of the poem by making the opening lines of introduction integral to understanding Parmenides’ message. By setting forth its own unacceptable fiction, paralleling the elements of the Doxa in a ring-composition, the Proem simultaneously establishes the scope of the ensuing inquiry, and its target. Maintaining Parmenides’ historical position as the “father of metaphysics,” the narrative that he advanced a strictly secular account of all reality is challenged. Instead, Parmenides is best understood as further advancing Xenophanes’ criticisms of traditional religion, an intellectual relationship which the ancient testimonia strongly supports.
Keywords Parmenides  Metaphysics  Xenophanes  Philosophy of Religion  Presocratic  Ancient Philosophy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How Many Doxai Are There in Parmenides?Panagiotis Thanassas - 2006 - Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 2:199-218.
Eleatic Questions.G. E. L. Owen - 1960 - Classical Quarterly 10 (1-2):84-.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sugestões Para a Interpretação Do Poema de Parmênides.Rafael Huguenin - 2009 - Síntese - Revista de Filosofia 36 (115):21.
Parmenides and Plato's Socrates: The Communication of Structure.John Blanchard - 2001 - Dissertation, New School for Social Research
Aspects of Plato's Reception of Parmenides.John Anderson Palmer - 1996 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Parmenidean Irony.John F. Newell - 2002 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Parmenides' Modal Fallacy.Frank Lewis - 2009 - Phronesis 54 (1):1-8.
Plato's Parmenides: A Principle of Interpretation and Seven Arguments.Sandra Peterson - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (2):167-192.


Added to PP index

Total views
1,129 ( #3,134 of 2,349,550 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
320 ( #1,061 of 2,349,550 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes