Environmental Ethics 26 (2):171-188 (2004)

Craig DeLancey
State University of New York at Oswego
The view that organisms deserve moral respect because they have their own purposes is often grounded in a specification of the biological functions that the organism has. One way to identify such functions, adopted by Gary Varner, is to determine the etiology of some behavior based on the evolution of the structures enabling it. This view suffers from some unacceptable problems, including that some organisms with profound defects will by definition have a welfare interest in their defects. For example, this view entails that the patented oncomice, intentionally engineered and bred for a genetic defect that leads to extremely high incidence of cancer, would have a welfare interest in the development of tumors. The systems-based theory of biological functions, which refers not to the evolution of structures but rather to their role in the organism, escapes these problems, and shows how a theory of an organism’s welfare interest in its purposes can be grounded in a sound naturalistic approach. This approach also has some fruitful corollaries, including an elegant theory of why species may require special moral regard.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  General Interest
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0163-4275
DOI enviroethics200426228
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,262
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Theory of the Organism-Environment System: I. Description of the Theory.Timo Jarvilehto - 1998 - Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 33 (4):321-334.
Disease, Dysfunction, and Synthetic Biology.Sune Holm - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (4):329-345.
The Organism in Developmental Systems Theory.Thomas Pradeu - 2010 - Biological Theory 5 (3):216-222.
Interests: Their Nature, Scope, and Significance.Gary Edward Varner - 1988 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
The Organism in Developmental Systems Theory.Thomas Pradeu - 2009 - Biological Theory 5 (3):216-222.
Organism and Artifact: Proper Functions in Paley Organisms.Sune Holm - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4b):706-713.
Explaining Biological Functionality: Is Control Theory Enough?J. Collier - 2011 - South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):53-62.
The Organism View Defended.S. Matthew Liao - 2006 - The Monist 89 (3):334-350.
An Emotocentric Theory of Interests.Warren Neill - 1998 - Environmental Ethics 20 (2):163-182.
An Emotocentric Theory of Interests.Warren Neill - 1998 - Environmental Ethics 20 (2):163-182.
Biological Functions and Biological Interests.Gary E. Varner - 1990 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):251-270.


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #1,178,171 of 2,455,634 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #225,855 of 2,455,634 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes