Authors
Abstract
Substantially increased wealth inequality across the developed world has prompted many philosophers, economists and legal theorists to support comprehensive taxes on all forms of wealth. Proposals include levying taxes on the basis of total wealth, or alternatively the change in the value of capital holdings measured from year-to-year. This contrasts with most existing policies that tax capital assets at the point they are transferred from one beneficiary to another through sale or gifts. Are these tax reforms likely to meet their aims of greater economic and political equality? We argue that these policies are likely to fail because, following neoclassical economic theory, they are based on a conception of capital as possessing given values in what amounts to a static equilibrium. This mischaracterizes the dynamic and subjective character of market economies and the contested value of real instantiations of capital goods. This makes them very difficult, often impossible, to value apart from at the point of voluntary transfer or profit realization. This means most taxes levied on a mark-to-market basis will be arbitrary and unfair. We propose alternative policies based on an income realization approach to taxation that are more likely to curb excessive wealth holdings. This includes introducing international treaties that prohibit preferential tax treatment for individual companies and specific sectors, and broadening the income tax base to include the imputed rent of personal housing wealth.
Keywords Wealth inequality  capital taxation  distributive justice  market economy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13698230.2019.1644585
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Survey Article: Philosophy and Public Policy After Piketty.Martin O'Neill - 2017 - Journal of Political Philosophy 25 (3):343-375.
Tax Competition and Global Background Justice.Peter Dietsch & Thomas Rixen - 2014 - Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (2):150-177.
Liberty, Equality and Property-Owning Democracy.Martin O'Neill - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (3):379-396.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Turning the Tide on Tax.Martin O'Neill - 2015 - In Daisy-Rose Srblin (ed.), Values Added: Rethinking Tax for the 21st Century. Fabian Society. pp. 11-16.
Distributive Justice, Injustice and Beyond Justice.Wei Xiaopin - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:857-872.
Ethics and Taxation: A Theoretical Framework.Ronald M. Green - 1984 - Journal of Religious Ethics 12 (2):146 - 161.
Democratic Distributive Justice.Ross Zucker - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Price Gouging, Non-Worseness, and Distributive Justice.Matt Zwolinski - 2009 - Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (2):295-306.
The Market, Competition, and Equality.Peter Dietsch - 2010 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (2):213-244.
Corrective Vs. Distributive Justice: The Case of Apologies.Andrew I. Cohen - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (3):663-677.
Justice and Taxation.Daniel Halliday - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (12):1111-1122.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-07-28

Total views
100 ( #96,157 of 2,367,996 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #30,733 of 2,367,996 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes