Theory and Society 51 (1):91-116 (2022)

Abstract
This paper argues that historical research on late medieval and early modern craft guilds fails to escape teleological and anachronistic views, including when they are addressed as commons or ‘institutions for collective action’. These present-day conceptual lenses do not only create idealized views on guilds, but also of the contexts in which they operated, especially the state and the market. This is especially the case with neo-institutional views on the commons, which fall back on a transhistorical rational actor, who can choose between three options for the allocation of resources and surpluses, namely the state, the market and the common. The paper shows that guilds were fundamentally entangled with both the state and the market and that their ethic implied a less utilitarian and instrumental attitude towards natural resources. The consequence of this is that the history of the guilds offers different lessons to present-day commoners than those implied by present-day research. With an eye at launching a reflection on that, I argue in favour of a cosmopolitical perspective, which invites to take fundamentally different worldviews seriously. This includes questioning our own conceptual and analytical abstractions like the state, the market and the individual, up to and including the very distinction between nature and society or nature and politics, which are at the very basis of modern science itself.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11186-021-09444-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to the Actor-Network Theory.Bruno Latour - 2005 - Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
We Have Never Been Modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Harvard University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Science, Instruments, and Guilds in Early-Modern Britain.Larry Stewart - 2005 - Early Science and Medicine 10 (3):392-410.
Instrument Makers in the London Guilds.M. A. Crawforth - 1987 - Annals of Science 44 (4):319-377.
Organization of Festivals and the Dionysiac Guilds.G. M. Sifakis - 1965 - Classical Quarterly 15 (02):206-.
Organization of Festivals and the Dionysiac Guilds.G. M. Sifakis - 1965 - Classical Quarterly 15 (2):206-214.
Ethical Obligations in a Tragedy of the Commons.Baylor L. Johnson - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (3):271-287.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-03-17

Total views
3 ( #1,357,367 of 2,506,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,828 of 2,506,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes