Defending human enhancement technologies: unveiling normativity

Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (8):483-487 (2010)

Authors
Inmaculada de Melo-Martin
Weill Cornell Medicine--Cornell University
Abstract
Recent advances in biotechnologies have led to speculations about enhancing human beings. Many of the moral arguments presented to defend human enhancement technologies have been limited to discussions of their risks and benefits. The author argues that in so far as ethical arguments focus primarily on risks and benefits of human enhancement technologies, these arguments will be insufficient to provide a robust defence of these technologies. This is so because the belief that an assessment of risks and benefits is a sufficient ethical evaluation of these technologies incorrectly presupposes that risk assessments do not involve value judgements. Second, it presupposes a reductionist conception of ethics as merely a risk management instrument. Each of these assumptions separates ethical evaluation from discussion and appraisal of ends and means and thus leaves important—indeed, essential—ethical considerations out of view. Once these problematic assumptions are rejected, it becomes clear that an adequate defence of human enhancement technologies requires more than a simple balance of their risks and benefits
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2010.036095
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,238
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Virtue Ethics.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1999 - Oxford University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Neuroethics Beyond Normal.John R. Shook & James Giordano - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (1):121-140.
Vorsprung Durch Technik: On Biotechnology, Bioethics, and Its Beneficiaries.Nicky Priaulx - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2):174-184.
Is Human Enhancement Also a Personal Matter?Vincent Menuz, Thierry Hurlimann & Béatrice Godard - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):161-177.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Enhancing Justice?Tamara Garcia & Ronald Sandler - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (3):277-287.
In Defense of Posthuman Dignity.Nick Bostrom - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):202–214.
Is Human Enhancement Also a Personal Matter?Vincent Menuz, Thierry Hurlimann & Béatrice Godard - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):161-177.
Life Enhancement Technologies: Significance of Social Category Membership.Christine Overall - 2009 - In Julian Savulescu & Nick Bostrom (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press.
Enhancement Technologies and Human Identity.David Degrazia - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):261 – 283.
Enhancement Technologies and the Modern Self.C. Elliott - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):364-374.
Against Unrestricted Human Enhancement.Patrick Lin & Fritz Allhoff - 2008 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 18 (1):35-41.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-13

Total views
50 ( #176,888 of 2,285,841 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #250,216 of 2,285,841 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature