Theoria 83 (4):364-393 (2017)

Authors
Erhan Demircioglu
Koc University
Abstract
In this article, I make a distinction between two versions of non-epistemicism about seeing, and bring explicitly into view and argue against a particular version defended by Dretske. More specifically, I distinguish non-epistemic seeing as non-conceptual seeing, where concept possession is assumed to be cognitively demanding, from non-epistemic seeing as seeing without noticing, where noticing is assumed to be relatively cognitively undemanding. After showing that Dretske argues for the possibility of non-epistemic seeing in both senses of the term, I target his thesis that a given subject sees all the objects that are visually differentiated in her visual field, where visual differentiation does not require that she notice those objects. I argue that the notion of a visual field deployed in the formulation of the thesis cannot be phenomenal and therefore that seeing without noticing amounts to mere visual confrontation. I further argue that since the epistemicist does not deny the existence of seeing without noticing in the sense of mere visual confrontation, there is a clear sense in which Dretske's non-epistemicism turns out to be trivial.
Keywords Dretske  non‐epistemic seeing  visual differentiation  visual noticing  visual perception
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/theo.12127
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,268
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Varieties of Reference.Louise M. Antony - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (2):275.
Knowlegde and the Flow of Information.F. Dretske - 1989 - Trans/Form/Ação 12:133-139.
The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:125-126.
Two Concepts of Consciousness.David M. Rosenthal - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 49 (May):329-59.
Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory.Peter Carruthers - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):265-268.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Toward a Perceptual Account of Mindreading.Somogy Varga - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (2):380-401.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Object Seeing and Spatial Perception.Craig French - 2018 - In Fiona MacPherson & Fabian Dorsch (eds.), Phenomenal Presence.
Visual Perception and Subjective Visual Awareness.Antti Revonsuo - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):769-770.
Sound and Vision.Edward Jones-Imhotep - 2012 - Spontaneous Generations 6 (1):191-202.
Dretske on Knowledge and Content.Olav Gjelsvik - 1991 - Synthese 86 (March):425-41.
Visual Data – Reasons to Be Relied On?Nicola Mößner - 2017 - In Nicola Mößner & Alfred Nordmann (eds.), Reasoning in Measurement. New York: Routledge. pp. 99-110.
Successful Visual Epistemic Representation.Agnes Bolinska - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:153-160.
Perception and Belief.A. D. Smith - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):283-309.
Inscrutability and Visual Objects.Ben Phillips - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):2949-2971.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-06-13

Total views
46 ( #201,988 of 2,325,396 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #171,137 of 2,325,396 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes