Film as a mobilizing agent? Adorno and Benjamin on aesthetic experience

Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (9):939-954 (2012)
This article evaluates the role of art – particularly mechanically reproduced forms of art – in the writings of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno. The central claim is that both thinkers share the same conviction as to the emancipatory potentials of the work of art. Yet, they evaluate the effects of technological innovation differently. The underpinnings of this later resolved discord, however, are philosophical. In contrast to Benjamin’s belief in the possibility of mass mobilization, for Adorno the relevant category remains unequivocally the individual subject
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453712461345
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,688
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Kant, Adorno and the Work of Art.M. W. Skees - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (8):915-933.
Aura: The Aesthetic of Redemption?Yvonne Sherratt - 1998 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (1):25-41.
Adorno's Aesthetic Concept of Aura.Yvonne Sherratt - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (2):155-177.
The Artwork and the Promesse du Bonheur in Adorno.James Gordon Finlayson - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):392-419.
Theodor W. Adorno.Gerard Delanty (ed.) - 2004 - Sage Publications.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
66 ( #91,445 of 2,237,277 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #186,360 of 2,237,277 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature