Film as a mobilizing agent? Adorno and Benjamin on aesthetic experience

Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (9):939-954 (2012)
Abstract
This article evaluates the role of art – particularly mechanically reproduced forms of art – in the writings of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno. The central claim is that both thinkers share the same conviction as to the emancipatory potentials of the work of art. Yet, they evaluate the effects of technological innovation differently. The underpinnings of this later resolved discord, however, are philosophical. In contrast to Benjamin’s belief in the possibility of mass mobilization, for Adorno the relevant category remains unequivocally the individual subject
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453712461345
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,515
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant, Adorno and the Work of Art.M. W. Skees - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (8):915-933.
Aura: The Aesthetic of Redemption?Yvonne Sherratt - 1998 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (1):25-41.
Adorno's Aesthetic Concept of Aura.Yvonne Sherratt - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (2):155-177.
The Artwork and the Promesse du Bonheur in Adorno.James Gordon Finlayson - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):392-419.
Theodor W. Adorno.Gerard Delanty (ed.) - 2004 - Sage Publications.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-11-22

Total downloads
66 ( #94,619 of 2,268,268 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #373,235 of 2,268,268 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature