Moral Responsibility is Not Proportionate to Causal Responsibility

Southern Journal of Philosophy 60 (4):570-591 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It seems intuitive to think that if you contribute more to an outcome, you should be more morally responsible for it. Some philosophers think this is correct. They accept the thesis that ceteris paribus one's degree of moral responsibility for an outcome is proportionate to one's degree of causal contribution to that outcome. Yet, what the degree of causal contribution amounts to remains unclear in the literature. Hence, the underlying idea in this thesis remains equally unclear. In this article, I will consider various plausible criteria for measuring degrees of causal contribution. After each of these criteria, I will show that this thesis entails implausible results. I will also show that there are other plausible theoretical options that can account for the kind of cases that motivate this thesis. I will conclude that we should reject this thesis.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,213

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Causal Proportions and Moral Responsibility.Sara Bernstein - 2017 - In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, Volume 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 165-182.
Against resultant moral luck.Huzeyfe Demirtas - 2022 - Ratio 35 (3):225-235.
Causation and responsibility.Carolina Sartorio - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (5):749–765.
Causation comes in degrees.Huzeyfe Demirtas - 2022 - Synthese 200 (1):1-17.
The Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility.Dana Kay Nelkin & Derk Pereboom (eds.) - 2022 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Causal and Moral Indeterminacy.Sara Bernstein - 2016 - Ratio 29 (4):434-447.
Responsibility Regardless of Causation.Federico Faroldi - 2014 - In Bacchini, Dell'Utri & Caputo (eds.), New Advances in Causation, Agency, and Moral Responsibility. Cambridge Scholars Press.
A new defence of probability discounting.Kian Mintz-Woo - 2017 - In Adrian Walsh, Säde Hormio & Duncan Purves (eds.), The Ethical Underpinnings of Climate Economics. Oxford: Routledge. pp. 87-102.
Responsibility in Context.Ann Whittle - 2018 - Erkenntnis 83 (2):163-183.
Attributionism and degrees of Praiseworthiness.Daniel J. Miller - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (10):3071-3087.
Agency as difference-making: causal foundations of moral responsibility.Johannes Himmelreich - 2015 - Dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-25

Downloads
45 (#296,043)

6 months
21 (#90,993)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Huzeyfe Demirtas
Chapman University

Citations of this work

Charitable Matching and Moral Credit.Daniel Nolan - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Responsibility From the Margins.David Shoemaker - 2015 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Two concepts of causation.Ned Hall - 2004 - In John Collins, Ned Hall & Laurie Paul (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals. MIT Press. pp. 225-276.
Reflection and Responsibility.Pamela Hieronymi - 2014 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (1):3-41.

View all 37 references / Add more references