Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):171-186 (2003)
This paper compares two basic approaches to “ontology”. One originated within the analytic tradition, and it encompasses two diverging streams, philosophy of language and (contemporary) philosophy of mind which lead to “reduced ontology” and “neo-Aristotelian ontology”, respectively. The other approach is “phenomenological ontology” (more precisely, the Husserlian, not the Heideggerian version).Ontology as a theory of reference (“reduced” ontology, or ontology dependent on semantics) is presented and justified on the basis of some classical thesis of traditional philosophy of language (from Frege to Quine). “Reduced ontology” is shown to be identifiable with one level of the traditional, Aristotelian ontology, which corresponds to one ofthe four “senses of Being” listed in Aristotle’s Metaphysics: “being” as “being true”. This identification is justified on the basis of Brentano’s “rules for translation” of the Aristotelian table of judgements in terms of (positive and negative) existential judgments such as are easily translatable into sentences of first order predicate logic.The second part of the paper is concerned with “neo-Aristotelian ontology”, i.e. with naturalism and physicalism as the main ontological options underlying most of the contemporary discussion in philosophy of mind. The qualification of such options as “neo-Aristotelian” is justified; the relationships between “neo-Aristotelian” and “reduced” ontology are discussed. The third part presents the basic claim of “phenomenological ontology”: the claim that a logical theory of existence and being does capture a sense of “existing” and “being” which, even if not itself the basic one, is grounded in the basic one. An attempt is done at further clarifying this “more basic” sense of “being”. An argument making use of this supposedly “more basic” sense is advanced in favour of “phenomenological ontology”
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Aristotelian and Naturalistic Ontology.Alessandro Giordani - 2006 - In A. Corradini, S. Galvan & E. J. Lowe (eds.), Analytic Philosophy Without Naturalism. Routledge.
Quantifier Variance and Realism: Essays in Metaontology.Eli Hirsch - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Brentano’s Ontology: From Conceptualism to Reism.Arkadiusz Chrudzimski & Barry Smith - 2004 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Brentano. Cambridge University Press. pp. 197--220.
Ontological Frameworks for Scientific Theories.Jonas R. B. Arenhart - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (4):339-356.
Roman Ingarden. Ontology From a Phenomenological Point of View.Arkadiusz Chrudzimski - 2004 - Reports on Philosophy 22:121-142.
The Anatomy of the Image: Toward an Applied Onto-Psychiatry.James M. Fielding & Dirk Marwede - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (4):287-303.
Stuff Versus Individuals.Lucía Lewowicz & Olimpia Lombardi - 2013 - Foundations of Chemistry 15 (1):65-77.
The Ultimate Constituents of the Material World - In Search of an Ontology for Fundamental Physics.Meinard Kuhlmann - 2010 - ontos.
Ontology: Towards a New Synthesis.Barry Smith & Chris Welty - 2002 - In Formal Ontology in Information Systems. ACM Press.
Truth, Sentential Non-Compositionality, and Ontology.Lorenz B. Puntel - 2001 - Synthese 126 (1-2):221 - 259.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads21 ( #238,244 of 2,172,866 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #172,512 of 2,172,866 )
How can I increase my downloads?