New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press (2018)

Authors
Inmaculada de Melo-Martin
Weill Cornell Medicine--Cornell University
Abstract
The lack of public support for climate change policies and refusals to vaccinate children are just two alarming illustrations of the impacts of dissent about scientific claims. Dissent can lead to confusion, false beliefs, and widespread public doubt about highly justified scientific evidence. Even more dangerously, it has begun to corrode the very authority of scientific consensus and knowledge. Deployed aggressively and to political ends, some dissent can intimidate scientists, stymie research, and lead both the public and policymakers to oppose important public policies firmly rooted in science. To criticize dissent is, however, a fraught exercise. Skepticism and fearless debate are key to the scientific process, making it both vital and incredibly difficult to characterize and identify dissent that is problematic in its approach and consequences. Indeed, as de Melo-Martín and Intemann show, the criteria commonly proposed as means of identifying inappropriate dissent are flawed and the strategies generally recommended to tackle such dissent are not only ineffective but could even make the situation worse. The Fight Against Doubt proposes that progress on this front can best be achieved by enhancing the trustworthiness of the scientific community and by being more realistic about the limits of science when it comes to policymaking. It shows that a richer understanding of the context in which science operates is needed to disarm problematic dissent and those who deploy it. This, the authors argue, is the best way forward, rather than diagnosing the many instances of wrong-headed dissent.
Keywords Philosophy of science  Scientific Dissent  Values in Science  Climate Change  Epistemic Trust
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,491
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Democratic Values: A Better Foundation for Public Trust in Science.S. Andrew Schroeder - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axz023.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Consensus in Science.Miriam Solomon - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:193-204.
Professor.Michael Lynch - forthcoming - In Voicing Dissent. New York: Routledge.
Social Empiricism.Miriam Solomon - 2001 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
In Defense of “Targeting” Some Dissent About Science.Erin J. Nash - 2018 - Perspectives on Science 26 (3):325-359.
Teaching for Dissent.David Oliver Kasdan - 2014 - Education and Culture 30 (2):107-110.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-31

Total views
47 ( #207,753 of 2,381,244 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #60,586 of 2,381,244 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes