According to evolutionist Francisco Ayala, Darwin’s greatest achievement was to show that the organized complexity of living things could be brought about without recourse to a designing intelligence. Given this view of Darwin’s achievement, what evolutionary biology has come to mean by “evolution” is an unintelligent or blind form of it. This was brought home to me two years ago at a debate in which I participated. I was invited, along with my colleague and friend Michael Behe, to debate Darwinists Kenneth Miller and Robert Pennock at the American Museum of Natural History in Manhattan. The debate was initially titled “Blind Evolution or Intelligent Design?” Yet, when the debate actually took place on April 23, 2002, the program bulletin distributed at the event quietly dropped the word “blind” and titled the debate simply “Evolution or Intelligent Design?” The original title was more accurate. Intelligent design, the view for which Behe and I were arguing, is opposed to blind evolution, not to evolution simpliciter.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
No Free Lunch Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased Without Intelligence.William A. Dembski - 2002
The Endless "Controversy:" Evolution and Its Critics.Jason Borenstein - 2009 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 3 (2).
Should Students Be Able to Opt Out of Evolution? Some Philosophical Considerations.Robert T. Pennock - unknown
Contenu, Enjeux Et Diversité des Acceptions de L’Intelligent Design En Contexte Étatsunien.Philippe Gagnon - 2007 - Connaître. Cahiers de l'Association Foi Et Culture Scientifique 26:9-43.
Intelligent Design's Contribution to the Debate Over Evolution: A Reply to Henry Morris.William Dembski - manuscript
Intelligent Design in Cultural Evolution.Lee Cronk - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):352-353.
Sober on Intelligent Design. [REVIEW]Sahotra Sarkar - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):683-691.
Reply to My Critics: A Response to Reviews of Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. [REVIEW]Michael J. Behe - 2001 - Biology and Philosophy 16 (5):683-707.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #296,373 of 2,164,541 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,971 of 2,164,541 )
How can I increase my downloads?