Anybody interested in evolutionary explanations of social phenomena (and every philosopher should be) will learn a lot from Unto Others. In addition to its cornucopia of fascinating empirical findings from biology and psychology, it is chock full of arresting perspectives, ingenious thought experiments, and clear expositions of difficult-indeed, treacherous-concepts that should be in every philosopher's kit. What philosophers will not learn, however, is the status of group selection in current evolutionary theory, because while Sober and Wilson (hereafter S&W) strive intelligently to clarify and unify the issues, some of their efforts muddy the waters instead. This is mainly due to the lingering effects of ancient feuds and score-settling on both sides. So far as I can see, nobody has yet been able to come up with a judicious overview of the whole scene. Evolutionists love to pick a fight. Why propose a friendly amendment when you can claim to overthrow some major edifice of orthodoxy with your revolutionary idea? And what could be more satisfying than resurrecting a derided heresy? Stephen Jay Gould briefly tried to restore Goldschmidt's "hopeful monster" saltationism as part of his campaign for punctuated equilibrium, which was itself not as revolutionary as he claimed (Dennett, 1995); hardly a year goes by without somebody declaring that something they have discovered is, actually, a genuine instance of Lamarckianism. There is usually a grain of truth, or more, in these dramatic claims. Prions really do constitute a major exception to Crick's Central Dogma about the direction of information flow between DNA and proteins..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Beyond Inclusive Fitness? On A Simple And General Explanation For The Evolution of Altruism.Alejandro Rosas - 2010 - Philosophy and Theory in Biology 2 (20130604).
The Tragedy of a Priori Selectionism: Dennett and Gould on Adaptationism. [REVIEW]Jeremy C. Ahouse - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (3):359-391.
The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus.Elliott Sober - 1984 - University of Chicago Press.
Evolution, Altruism and "Internal Reward" Explanations.John S. Brunero - 2002 - Philosophical Forum 33 (4):413–424.
Evolution, Altruism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critique of Sober and Wilson's Argument for Psychological Altruism.Stephen Stich - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (2):267-281.
Evolutionary Theory and the Social Uses of Biology.Philip Kitcher - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (1):1-15.
Review of Sober's "Philosophy of Biology". [REVIEW]J. Dupre - 1996 - Philosophical Explorations 63:143-145.
Evolutionary Psychology: The Burdens or Proof. [REVIEW]Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (2):211-33.
Sober & Wilson's Evolutionary Arguments for Psychological Altruism: A Reassessment.Armin W. Schulz - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (2):251-260.
Crick's Notion of Genetic Information and the ‘Central Dogma’ of Molecular Biology.Predrag Sustar - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (1):13-24.
Domains, Plural Truth, and Mixed Atomic Propositions.Jeremy Wyatt - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):225-236.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads37 ( #133,424 of 2,146,956 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #385,507 of 2,146,956 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.