Altruists, Chumps, and Inconstant Pluralists

Anybody interested in evolutionary explanations of social phenomena (and every philosopher should be) will learn a lot from Unto Others. In addition to its cornucopia of fascinating empirical findings from biology and psychology, it is chock full of arresting perspectives, ingenious thought experiments, and clear expositions of difficult-indeed, treacherous-concepts that should be in every philosopher's kit. What philosophers will not learn, however, is the status of group selection in current evolutionary theory, because while Sober and Wilson (hereafter S&W) strive intelligently to clarify and unify the issues, some of their efforts muddy the waters instead. This is mainly due to the lingering effects of ancient feuds and score-settling on both sides. So far as I can see, nobody has yet been able to come up with a judicious overview of the whole scene. Evolutionists love to pick a fight. Why propose a friendly amendment when you can claim to overthrow some major edifice of orthodoxy with your revolutionary idea? And what could be more satisfying than resurrecting a derided heresy? Stephen Jay Gould briefly tried to restore Goldschmidt's "hopeful monster" saltationism as part of his campaign for punctuated equilibrium, which was itself not as revolutionary as he claimed (Dennett, 1995); hardly a year goes by without somebody declaring that something they have discovered is, actually, a genuine instance of Lamarckianism. There is usually a grain of truth, or more, in these dramatic claims. Prions really do constitute a major exception to Crick's Central Dogma about the direction of information flow between DNA and proteins..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,767
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Evolution, Altruism and "Internal Reward" Explanations.John S. Brunero - 2002 - Philosophical Forum 33 (4):413–424.
Evolutionary Theory and the Social Uses of Biology.Philip Kitcher - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (1):1-15.
Review of Sober's "Philosophy of Biology". [REVIEW]J. Dupre - 1996 - Philosophical Explorations 63:143-145.
Daniel Dennett.Don Ross - 2010 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (2):295-299.
Daniel Dennett.Andrew Brook & Don Ross (eds.) - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Crick's Notion of Genetic Information and the ‘Central Dogma’ of Molecular Biology.Predrag Sustar - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (1):13-24.
Domains, Plural Truth, and Mixed Atomic Propositions.Jeremy Wyatt - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):225-236.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

37 ( #133,424 of 2,146,956 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #385,507 of 2,146,956 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums