Beyond response output: More logical than we think

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):87-88 (2009)
Abstract
Oaksford & Chater (O&C) rely on a data fitting approach to show that a Bayesian model captures the core reasoning data better than its logicist rivals. The problem is that O&C's modeling has focused exclusively on response output data. I argue that this exclusive focus is biasing their conclusions. Recent studies that focused on the processes that resulted in the response selection are more positive for the role of logic
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X09000326
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,727
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Choice Output and Choice Processing: An Analogy to Similarity.Arthur B. Markman - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):423-424.
Innate Cognitive Capacities.Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 2007 - Mind and Language 22 (1):92-115.
Peirce: Underdetermination, Agnosticism, and Related Mistakes.P. D. Magnus - 2005 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):26 – 37.
Corruption and Representations of Scholarly Output.Robert Liebler - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):259-269.
Remarks on "Random Sequences".Branden Fitelson & Daniel Osherson - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Logic 12 (1).
Accidental Necessity and Logical Determinism.Alfred J. Freddoso - 1983 - Journal of Philosophy 80 (5):257-278.
Added to PP index
2009-02-13

Total downloads
11 ( #415,422 of 2,197,328 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #29,445 of 2,197,328 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature