Combinatorial principles weaker than Ramsey's Theorem for pairs

Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (1):171-206 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We investigate the complexity of various combinatorial theorems about linear and partial orders, from the points of view of computability theory and reverse mathematics. We focus in particular on the principles ADS (Ascending or Descending Sequence), which states that every infinite linear order has either an infinite descending sequence or an infinite ascending sequence, and CAC (Chain-AntiChain), which states that every infinite partial order has either an infinite chain or an infinite antichain. It is well-known that Ramsey's Theorem for pairs (RT₂²) splits into a stable version (SRT₂²) and a cohesive principle (COH). We show that the same is true of ADS and CAC, and that in their cases the stable versions are strictly weaker than the full ones (which is not known to be the case for RT₂² and SRT₂²). We also analyze the relationships between these principles and other systems and principles previously studied by reverse mathematics, such as WKL₀, DNR, and BΣ₂. We show, for instance, that WKL₀ is incomparable with all of the systems we study. We also prove computability-theoretic and conservation results for them. Among these results are a strengthening of the fact, proved by Cholak, Jockusch, and Slaman, that COH is Π₁¹-conservative over the base system RCA₀. We also prove that CAC does not imply DNR which, combined with a recent result of Hirschfeldt, Jockusch, Kjos-Hanssen, Lempp, and Slaman, shows that CAC does not imply SRT₂² (and so does not imply RT₂²). This answers a question of Cholak, Jockusch, and Slaman. Our proofs suggest that the essential distinction between ADS and CAC on the one hand and RT₂² on the other is that the colorings needed for our analysis are in some way transitive. We formalize this intuition as the notions of transitive and semitransitive colorings and show that the existence of homogeneous sets for such colorings is equivalent to ADS and CAC, respectively. We finish with several open questions



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Primitive Recursion and the Chain Antichain Principle.Alexander P. Kreuzer - 2012 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (2):245-265.
Stable Ramsey's Theorem and Measure.Damir D. Dzhafarov - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (1):95-112.
Constructing sequences one step at a time.Henry Towsner - 2020 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 20 (3):2050017.
Stability and Posets.Carl G. Jockusch, Bart Kastermans, Steffen Lempp, Manuel Lerman & Reed Solomon - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (2):693-711.


Added to PP

49 (#103,641)

6 months
12 (#1,086,452)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Open questions in reverse mathematics.Antonio Montalbán - 2011 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 17 (3):431-454.
Reverse mathematics and Peano categoricity.Stephen G. Simpson & Keita Yokoyama - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (3):284-293.
The polarized Ramsey’s theorem.Damir D. Dzhafarov & Jeffry L. Hirst - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (2):141-157.

View all 33 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

There is no low maximal d. c. e. degree– Corrigendum.M. Arslanov & S. B. Cooper - 2004 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (6):628.

Add more references