Historical and contemporary perspectives on children's diets: is choice always in the patients' best interest?
Medical Humanities 36 (1):14-18 (2010)
On 29 March 1744, Thomasin Grace, a 13-year-old girl, was the first inpatient admitted to the Northampton General Infirmary (later the Northampton General Hospital). Inpatient hospital diets, then and now, are mainstays of effective patient treatment. In the mid-18th century there were four prescribed diets at Northampton: ‘full’, ‘milk’, ‘dry’ and ‘low’. Previous opinions concerning these four diets were unfavourable, but had not been based upon an individual dietetic assessment. Thomasin would most likely have been given the milk diet, but use of the full diet cannot be excluded. ‘Grace Everyman’ is Thomasin's modern equivalent. Under current NHS guidelines Thomasin would be considered a paediatric patient, but in 1744 she would have been considered as an adult. This study undertakes a full dietetic analysis of all the prescribed diets available for Thomasin in 1744 and compares this against random choices for Grace from the 2009 inpatient menu from the paediatric (Paddington) ward, and the adult ward inpatient menu at the Northampton General Hospital. The results show that, for Thomasin, the 1744 milk and full diets met the current advised nutritional requirements for adequate dietary intake. However, for Grace, the present 2009 Paddington and adult ward menu, although generally meeting nutritional requirements, could, if Grace or her carer consistently chose poorly during a prolonged inpatient stay, lead to inadequate nutrition. This challenges assumptions that hospital diets were historically inadequate, and that choice in present day equates with satisfactory nutritional intake
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nutritional Risks of Vegan Diets to Women and Children: Are They Preventable? [REVIEW]Johanna Dwyer & Franklin M. Loew - 1994 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7 (1):87-109.
Vegan Diets for Women, Infants, and Children.Ann Reed Mangels & Suzanne Havala - 1994 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7 (1):111-122.
Gay Science: Assisted Reproductive Technologies and the Sexual Orientation of Children.Timothy F. Murphy - 2005 - Reproductive Biomedicine Online 10 (Sup. 1):102-106.
Remarks on Russian Philosophy, Soviet Philosophy, and Historicism.T. Rockmore - 2009 - Diogenes 56 (2-3):84-94.
Self-Interest and Public Interest: The Motivations of Political Actors.Michael C. Munger - 2011 - Critical Review 23 (3):339-357.
Full Disclosure: Telling Patients When Not Being a Research Subject is a Good Choice.Jerry Menikoff - 2005 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48 (1):139-S149.
In Defense of the Vegan Ideal: Rhetoric and Bias in the Nutrition Literature. [REVIEW]Gary E. Varner - 1994 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7 (1):29-40.
Rational Choice and Moral Theory.Edward McClennen - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (5):521-540.
Conflicts of Interest in the Privatization of Child Welfare.Martin G. Leever - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):55-60.
Choosing Disabilities and Enhancements in Children: A Choice Too Far?Timothy F. Murphy - 2009 - Reproductie Biomedicine Online 2009 (18 sup. 1):43-49.
The Well-Being of Children, the Limits of Paternalism, and the State: Can Disparate Interests Be Reconciled?Michael S. Merry - 2007 - Ethics and Education 2 (1):39-59.
The Kibbutz Children's Society‐‐Ideal and Reality.Yuval Dror - 1995 - Journal of Moral Education 24 (3):273-288.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads6 ( #557,585 of 2,168,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,837 of 2,168,616 )
How can I increase my downloads?