In defence of conspiracy theories

Dissertation, University of Auckland (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this doctoral project is to explore the epistemic issues surrounding the concept of the conspiracy theory and to advance the analysis and evaluation of the conspiracy theory as a mode of explanation. The candidate is interested in the circumstances under which inferring to the truth or likeliness of a given conspiracy theory is, or is not, warranted.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Counterfact Conspiracy Theories.Susan Feldman - 2011 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (1):15-24.
Popper revisited, or what is wrong with conspiracy theories?Charles Pigden - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1):3-34.
Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing.Steve Clarke - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2):131-150.
Conspiracy Theories and Official Stories.David Coady - 2003 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):197-209.
Conspiracy theories of quantum mechanics.Peter J. Lewis - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):359-381.
Shit Happens.Pete Mandik - 2007 - Episteme 4 (2):205-218.
Are Conspiracy Theorists Irrational?David Coady - 2007 - Episteme 4 (2):193-204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-07-17

Downloads
4,894 (#1,156)

6 months
284 (#7,914)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

M R. X. Dentith
Beijing Normal University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references