Journal of Socio-Economics 32 (2):219-226 (2003)

Andy Denis
City University London
Bunge (2000) distinguishes two main methodological approaches of holism and individualism, and associates with them policy prescriptions of centralism and laissez-faire. He identifies systemism as a superior approach to both the study and management of society. The present paper, seeking to correct and develop this line of thought, suggests a more complex relation between policy and methodology. There are two possible methodological underpinnings for laissez-faire: while writers such as Friedman and Lucas fit Bunge’s pattern, more sophisticated advocates of laissez-faire, such as Smith and Hayek, base their policy prescription in a methodology quite divergent from the individualism Bunge describes.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Capitalism and Freedom.Milton Friedman - 1963 - Ethics 74 (1):70-72.
The Counter-Revolution of Science.F. Hayek - 1953 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (15):246-248.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Collective and Individual Rationality: Robert Malthus’s Heterodox Theodicy.A. Denis - 2003 - Department of Economics, City University London.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
153 ( #57,177 of 2,331,376 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #35,473 of 2,331,376 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes