Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):260-261 (2007)

Barbey & Sloman (B&S) claim that frequency formats and other task manipulations induce people to substitute associative thinking for rule-based thinking about nested sets. My critique focuses on the substitution assumption. B&S demonstrate that nested sets are important to solve base-rate problems but they do not show that thinking about these nested sets relies on a different type of reasoning
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X07001719
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,836
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Individual Differences in Rational Thought.Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 1998 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127 (2):161-188.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
30 ( #351,658 of 2,426,082 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #57,540 of 2,426,082 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes