Philoponus, Diodorus, and Possibility

Classical Quarterly 48 (01):327- (1998)
The definition here ascribed to Philo is entirely in line with what we know of Philo from else where: Alex. Aphr. in APr. 184.6–10; Simp, in Cat. 195.33–196.5; Boethius, in de Int. 234.10–15. The same is not true of the definition here ascribed to Diodorus. For Diodorus, we are told elsewhere, defined the possible as that which either is or will be so: Cic. Fat. 13, 17; Plu. de Stoic rep. 1055d-e; Alex. Aphr. in APr. 183.42–184.5; Boethius, in de Int. 234.22–4,412.16–7. Something has therefore got garbled
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/cq/48.1.327
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,433
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
John Philoponus, Simplicius, David J. Furley & Christian Wildberg (1991). Against Philoponus on the Eternity of the World. In John Philoponus, Simplicius, David J. Furley & Christian Wildberg (eds.), Place, Void, and Eternity. Cornell University Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

12 ( #355,197 of 1,924,998 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #308,471 of 1,924,998 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.