Property Rights, Future Generations and the Destruction and Degradation of Natural Resources

Moral Philosophy and Politics 2 (1):107-139 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper argues that members of future generations have an entitlement to natural resources equal to ours. Therefore, if a currently living individual destroys or degrades natural resources then he must pay compensation to members of future generations. This compensation takes the form of “primary goods” which will be valued by members of future generations as equally useful for promoting the good life as the natural resources they have been deprived of. As a result of this policy, each generation inherits a “Commonwealth” of natural resources plus compensation. It is this inherited “Commonwealth” which members of that generation must then pass on to members of the next generation. Once this picture is accepted, the standard bundle of property rights is problematic, for it takes the owner of a constituent of the Commonwealth to have the right to “waste, destroy or modify” that item at will. This paper therefore presents a revised set of property rights which takes seriously the idea that each generation has an equal claim on the resources that nature has bequeathed us, whilst allowing certain effects on those natural resources by each generation, and a degree of exclusive use of those natural resources owned by an individual.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Rights of Future Persons and the Ontology of Time.Aaron M. Griffith - 2017 - Journal of Social Philosophy 48 (1):58-70.
Future Generations, Natural Resources, and Property Rights.Gillian Brock - 1998 - Ethics and the Environment 3 (2):119-130.
Environmental Ethics and Rawls’ Theory of Justice.Russ Manning - 1981 - Environmental Ethics 3 (2):155-165.
An Essay on Rights. [REVIEW]Abraham Anderson - 1996 - Review of Metaphysics 49 (4):948-949.
The supersession thesis, climate change, and the rights of future people.Santiago Truccone-Borgogno - 2022 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25 (3):364-379.
Justice Between Generations.John William Clark Wolf - 1993 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-12

Downloads
925 (#18,569)

6 months
147 (#36,679)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Property Claims on Antibiotic Effectiveness.Cristian Timmermann - 2021 - Public Health Ethics 14 (3):256–267.
Effective Altruism and Extreme Poverty.Fırat Akova - 2020 - Dissertation, University of Warwick

Add more citations

References found in this work

The second treatise of government.John Locke - 1966 - [New York]: Barnes & Noble. Edited by J. W. Gough.
Voluntary euthanasia and the inalienable right to life.Joel Feinberg - 1978 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (2):93-123.
Taking up the Slack? Responsibility and justice in situations of partial compliance.David Miller - 2011 - In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and distributive justice. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 230--45.
Left‐Libertarianism: A Review Essay.Barbara H. Fried - 2004 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (1):66-92.

View all 10 references / Add more references