Deconstructing the substantialist conception of God: recasting Heidegger's critique of Augustine

Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 62 (2):330-353 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that Augustine's conception of God as substance (substantia) has misleadingly been evoked by Martin Heidegger's deconstruction of onto-theological and substantialist variants of metaphysics as they mistook entities (Seienden, entia, beings) f r their very Being (Sein, ens, esse) which cannot be conceptualized or objectified by human thinking, but makes both their thought and reality possible. Even though Augustine sought somehow to reconcile a Neoplatonic, essentialist cosmology with a Judeo-Christian worldview of historical redemption, Heidegger not only failed to properly recognize his indebtedness to Augustinian existential anthropology, but also the latter's contention that the actuality of beings and contingent history ultimately determines ontological concepts in their basic difference from their ontical counterparts, compromising thus Heidegger's intuitive criticisms against the confusion between God and Being (Sein).

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-27

Downloads
933 (#18,696)

6 months
129 (#46,745)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nythamar De Oliveira
Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

[Lettre-réponse à A. Piganiol].H. I. Marrou - 1955 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 60 (3):248-250.

Add more references