Authors
Nythamar De Oliveira
Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
Abstract
In this article, I argue that the neuroethics of cognitive enhancement can help us bridge the explanatory gap between metaethics and bioethics and throw light on the classic gap between moral beliefs and neural correlates of brain processes. Insofar as it unveils the irreducibility of first-person propositional attitudes, neuroethics allows for justifying cosmetic, pharmacological interventions so as to bring about human enhancement, regardless of descriptive accounts of its neural correlates and independently of the cognitivist, noncognitivist or hybrid inputs of metanormative theories. Precisely because it cannot provide the ultimate grounds for any conservative, libertarian or liberal attitudes towards cognitive enhancement, neuroethics is better conceived in terms of a Rawlsian-like wide reflective equilibrium, procedurally and without any specific substantive commitment to any moral or comprehensive doctrine of sorts.
Keywords Bioethics   Cognitive enhancement   Metaethics   Neuroethics   Selfhood
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.5007/1677-2954.2016v15n3p343
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Neuroethics.Walter Glannon - 2006 - Bioethics 20 (1):37–52.
Extended Mind and Cognitive Enhancement: Moral Aspects of Cognitive Artifacts.Richard Heersmink - 2017 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (1):17-32.
The Myth of Cognitive Enhancement Drugs.Hazem Zohny - 2015 - Neuroethics 8 (3):257-269.
Integration of Cognitive and Moral Enhancement.Vojin Rakic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):91-103.
Enhancement Versus Therapy in Catholic Neuroethics.Emily K. Trancik - 2015 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15 (1):63-72.
Introduction.Maartje Schermer & Ineke Bolt - 2009 - Neuroethics 2 (2):61-62.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-07-06

Total views
1 ( #1,508,138 of 2,454,648 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,377 of 2,454,648 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes