Beyond persons: extending the personal / subpersonal distinction to non-rational animals and artificial agents
Abstract
The distinction between personal level explanations and subpersonal ones has been subject to much debate in philosophy. We understand it as one between explanations that focus on an agent’s interaction with its environment, and explanations that focus on the physical or computational enabling conditions of such an interaction. The distinction, understood this way, is necessary for a complete account of any agent, rational or not, biological or artificial. In particular, we review some recent research in Artificial Life that pretends to do completely without the distinction, while using agent-centered concepts all the way. It is argued that the rejection of agent level explanations in favour of mechanistic ones is due to an unmotivated need to choose among representationalism and eliminativism. The dilemma is a false one if the possibility of a radical form of externalism is consideredMy notes
Similar books and articles
Beyond persons: extending the personal/subpersonal distinction to non-rational animals and artificial agents.Manuel de Pinedo-Garcia & Jason Noble - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (1):87-100.
The uses and abuses of the personal/subpersonal distinction.Zoe Drayson - 2012 - Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):1-18.
Constitutive relevance and the personal/subpersonal distinction.Matteo Colombo - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology (ahead-of-print):1â24.
Vehicles, contents, conceptual structure and externalism.Susan L. Hurley - 1998 - Analysis 58 (1):1-6.
Neural mechanisms of decision-making and the personal level.Nicholas Shea - 2013 - In K. W. M. Fulford, M. Davies, G. Graham, J. Sadler, G. Stanghellini & T. Thornton (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry. Oxford University Press. pp. 1063-1082.
Interaction without reduction: The relationship between personal and sub-personal levels of description.Martin Davies - 2000 - Mind and Society 1 (2):87-105.
The ethics of designing artificial agents.S. Grodzinsky Frances, W. Miller Keith & J. Wolf Marty - 2008 - Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2-3):112-121.
Modelling Trust in Artificial Agents, A First Step Toward the Analysis of e-Trust.Mariarosaria Taddeo - 2010 - Minds and Machines 20 (2):243-257.
Psychoanalysis and the personal/sub‐personal distinction.Sebastian Gardner - 2000 - Philosophical Explorations 3 (1):96-119.
The epistemological foundations of artificial agents.Nicola Lacey & M. Lee - 2003 - Minds and Machines 13 (3):339-365.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-29
Downloads
45 (#261,594)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
2014-03-29
Downloads
45 (#261,594)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Affordances and Landscapes: Overcoming the Nature–Culture Dichotomy through Niche Construction Theory.Manuel Heras-Escribano & Manuel De Pinedo-García - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.