Oxford University Press (2003)
The idea of a virtue has traditionally been important in ethics, but only recently has gained attention as an idea that can explain how we ought to form beliefs as well as how we ought to act. Moral philosophers and epistemologists have different approaches to the idea of intellectual virtue; here, Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski bring work from both fields together for the first time to address all of the important issues. It will be required reading for anyone working on either side of the debate.
|Keywords||Virtue epistemology Virtue|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$42.40 used (68% off) $76.70 new (41% off) $84.39 direct from Amazon (36% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BD176.I58 2003|
|ISBN(s)||0199252734 9780199252732 9780199219124|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Why We Don't Deserve Credit for Everything We Know.Jennifer Lackey - 2007 - Synthese 158 (3):345--361.
The Search for the Source of Epistemic Good.Linda Zagzebski - 2008 - In Duncan Pritchard & Ram Neta (eds.), Metaphilosophy. Routledge. pp. 55.
Similar books and articles
Recent Work on Virtue Epistemology.Guy Axtell - 1997 - American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (1):1 - 26.
Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility.Abrol Fairweather & Linda Zagzebski (eds.) - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
Review of Michael DePaul (Ed.), Linda Zagzebski (Ed.), Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives From Ethics and Epistemology. [REVIEW]Jennifer Lackey - 2004 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (8).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads130 ( #35,652 of 2,154,091 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #36,275 of 2,154,091 )
How can I increase my downloads?