In Defense of Logical Universalism: Taking Issue with Jean van Heijenoort [Book Review]

Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):553-586 (2012)
Van Heijenoort’s main contribution to history and philosophy of modern logic was his distinction between two basic views of logic, first, the absolutist, or universalist, view of the founding fathers, Frege, Peano, and Russell, which dominated the first, classical period of history of modern logic, and, second, the relativist, or model-theoretic, view, inherited from Boole, Schröder, and Löwenheim, which has dominated the second, contemporary period of that history. In my paper, I present the man Jean van Heijenoort (Sect. 1); then I describe his way of arguing for the second view (Sect. 2); and finally I come down in favor of the first view (Sect. 3). There, I specify the version of universalism for which I am prepared to argue (Sect. 3, introduction). Choosing ZFC to play the part of universal, logical (in a nowadays forgotten sense) system, I show, through an example, how the usual model theory can be naturally given its proper place, from the universalist point of view, in the logical framework of ZFC; I outline another, not rival but complementary, semantics for admissible extensions of ZFC in the very same logical framework; I propose a way to get universalism out of the predicaments in which universalists themselves believed it to be (Sect. 3.1). Thus, if universalists of the classical period did not, in fact, construct these semantics, it was not that their universalism forbade them, in principle, to do so. The historical defeat of universalism was not technical in character. Neither was it philosophical. Indeed, it was hardly more than the victory of technicism over the very possibility of a philosophical dispute (Sect. 3.2)
Keywords Jean van Heijenoort  philosophy of logic  history of logic  logical universalism  model theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11787-012-0066-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,515
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Alfred Tarski, Life and Logic.Anita Burdman Feferman & Solomon Feferman - 2005 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (4):535-540.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Logical Contextuality in Frege.Brice Halimi - 2018 - Review of Symbolic Logic 11 (1):1-20.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Jean van Heijenoort: Kaleidoscope. [REVIEW]Anita Burdman Feferman - 2012 - Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):277-291.
From Frege to Gödel.Jean Van Heijenoort (ed.) - 1967 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Logical Writings.Jacques Herbrand - 1971 - Dordrecht: Holland, D. Reidel Pub. Co..
Historical Development of Modern Logic.Jean van Heijenoort - 2012 - Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):327-337.
Subject and Predicate in Western Logic.Jean van Heijenoort - 1974 - Philosophy East and West 24 (3):253-268.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
48 ( #128,850 of 2,268,267 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #47,681 of 2,268,267 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature