Preconception care: A parenting protocol. A moral inquiry into the responsibilities of future parents towards their future children

Bioethics 25 (8):451-457 (2011)
In the Netherlands fertility doctors increasingly formulate protocols, which oblige patients to quit their unhealthy lifestyle before they are admitted to IVF procedures. We argue that moral arguments could justify parenting protocols that concern all future parents. In the first part we argue that want-to-be parents have moral responsibilities towards their future children to prevent them from harm by diminishing or eliminating risk factors before as well as during the pregnancy. This is because of the future children's potential to become of a certain type, more specifically: a person that will be the want-to-be parents' child. Want-to-be parents intend to become pregnant and therefore have an additional moral reason to diminish the risks. Also, people who become pregnant unintentionally have the responsibility to prevent their children from harm, unless they become pregnant due to contraception failure. All people not wanting to become pregnant should use contraception methods carefully.In the second part of this paper we translate the want-to-be parents' responsibilities into practice. We distinguish four determinants of risk factors: modifiability, chance, severity and effort. We examine some evidence-based risk factors based on these variables and deduce levels of responsibility.In conclusion, formulating informal requirements for want-to-be parents is morally required and therefore also for want-to-be parents in need of medical assistance. The protocols developed by fertility doctors in the Netherlands could be seen as the precursor for a general, informal Parenting Protocol that could be developed on the basis of an extended and thoroughly debated risk-responsibility analysis
Keywords future parents  future children  moral responsibility  parenting protocols  risk‐responsibilty analysis  preventing harm  preconception care
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01924.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,182
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
When Choosing the Traits of Children is Hurtful to Others.Timothy Murphy - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2):105-108.
Choosing Disabilities and Enhancements in Children: A Choice Too Far?Timothy F. Murphy - 2009 - Reproductie Biomedicine Online 2009 (18 sup. 1):43-49.
Fundamental Interests and Parental Rights.Michael W. Austin - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):221-235.
The Morality of Daycare.Michael McKeon - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (1):97-107.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

33 ( #156,413 of 2,172,024 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #117,665 of 2,172,024 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums