Preconception care: A parenting protocol. A moral inquiry into the responsibilities of future parents towards their future children
Bioethics 25 (8):451-457 (2011)
In the Netherlands fertility doctors increasingly formulate protocols, which oblige patients to quit their unhealthy lifestyle before they are admitted to IVF procedures. We argue that moral arguments could justify parenting protocols that concern all future parents. In the first part we argue that want-to-be parents have moral responsibilities towards their future children to prevent them from harm by diminishing or eliminating risk factors before as well as during the pregnancy. This is because of the future children's potential to become of a certain type, more specifically: a person that will be the want-to-be parents' child. Want-to-be parents intend to become pregnant and therefore have an additional moral reason to diminish the risks. Also, people who become pregnant unintentionally have the responsibility to prevent their children from harm, unless they become pregnant due to contraception failure. All people not wanting to become pregnant should use contraception methods carefully.In the second part of this paper we translate the want-to-be parents' responsibilities into practice. We distinguish four determinants of risk factors: modifiability, chance, severity and effort. We examine some evidence-based risk factors based on these variables and deduce levels of responsibility.In conclusion, formulating informal requirements for want-to-be parents is morally required and therefore also for want-to-be parents in need of medical assistance. The protocols developed by fertility doctors in the Netherlands could be seen as the precursor for a general, informal Parenting Protocol that could be developed on the basis of an extended and thoroughly debated risk-responsibility analysis
|Keywords||future parents future children moral responsibility parenting protocols risk‐responsibilty analysis preventing harm preconception care|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Is It Wrong to Deliberately Conceive or Give Birth to a Child with Mental Retardation?Simo Vehmas - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (1):47 – 63.
Choosing Tomorrow's Children: The Ethics of Selective Reproduction.Stephen Wilkinson - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Off-Label, Off-Limits? Parental Awareness and Attitudes Towards Off-Label Use in Paediatrics.Claudia Wiesemann - 2009 - European Journal of Pediatrics 168:1473-1478.
Parenting Style and the Development of Moral Reasoning.Lawrence J. Walker & Karl H. Hennig - 1999 - Journal of Moral Education 28 (3):359-374.
Criminal Parental Responsibility: Blaming Parents on the Basis of Their Duty to Control Versus Their Duty to Morally Educate Their Children.Doret Ruyter Leonie le Sagdee - 2008 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (6):789-802.
When Choosing the Traits of Children is Hurtful to Others.Timothy Murphy - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2):105-108.
Clients or Consumers, Commonplace or Pioneers? Navigating the Contemporary Class Politics of Family, Parenting Skills and Education.Rosalind Edwards & Val Gillies - 2011 - Ethics and Education 6 (2):141-154.
Choosing Disabilities and Enhancements in Children: A Choice Too Far?Timothy F. Murphy - 2009 - Reproductie Biomedicine Online 2009 (18 sup. 1):43-49.
Wrestling with the Future: Should We Test Children for Adult-Onset Genetic Conditions?Cynthia B. Cohen - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):111-130.
Fundamental Interests and Parental Rights.Michael W. Austin - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):221-235.
Book Review Essay, Parenting Good Children. [REVIEW]Darcia Narvaez & Christyan Mitchell - 1999 - Journal of Moral Education 28 (3):387-394.
Added to index2011-09-20
Total downloads33 ( #156,413 of 2,172,024 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,665 of 2,172,024 )
How can I increase my downloads?