Religious Studies 47 (4):449-463 (2011)

Jeroen De Ridder
VU University Amsterdam
Like David Silver before them, Erik Baldwin and Michael Thune argue that the facts of religious pluralism present an insurmountable challenge to the rationality of basic exclusive religious belief as construed by Reformed Epistemology. I will show that their argument is unsuccessful. First, their claim that the facts of religious pluralism make it necessary for the religious exclusivist to support her exclusive beliefs with significant reasons is one that the reformed epistemologist has the resources to reject. Secondly, they fail to demonstrate that it is impossible for basic religious beliefs to return to their properly basic state after defeaters against them have been defeated. Finally, I consider whether there is perhaps a similar but better argument in the neighbourhood and conclude in the negative. Reformed Epistemology's defence of exclusivism thus remains undefeated.
Keywords Religious epistemology  Reformed epistemology  Disagreement  Exclusivism  Defeaters  Religious pluralism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2011
DOI 10.1017/S0034412510000570
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Ethical Intuitionism.Michael Huemer - 2005 - Palgrave Macmillan.
Warranted Christian Belief.Alvin Plantinga - 2000 - Oxford University Press USA.
Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge.Stewart Cohen - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):309-329.
Principia Ethica.G. E. Moore - 1903 - Dover Publications.
Highlights of Recent Epistemology.James Pryor - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):95--124.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Pragmatic Defense of Religious Exclusivism.Girard Brenneman - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:13-18.
In Defence of a Contented Religious Exclusivism.Jerome Gellman - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (4):401-417.
Religious Pluralism Assessed.Avi Sagi - 1999 - Sophia 38 (2):93-115.
A Pragmatic Defense of Religious Exclusivism.Girard Brenneman - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:13-18.
Warrant, Defeaters, and the Epistemic Basis of Religious Belief.Christoph Jäger - 2005 - In Michael G. Parker and Thomas M. Schmidt (ed.), Scientific explanation and religious belief. Mohr Siebeck. pp. 81-98.
Defending Religious Pluralism for Religious Education.Andrew Davis - 2010 - Ethics and Education 5 (3):189 - 202.
Reformed Epistemology and the Problem of Religious Diversity.Ramona Hosu - 2013 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 12 (34):266-274.
Religious Epistemology.Chris Tweedt & Trent Dougherty - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (8):547-559.
More on Defending Religious Exclusivism.P. Roger Turner - 2015 - Faith and Philosophy 32 (2):188-204.


Added to PP index

Total views
1,219 ( #2,513 of 2,330,051 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
110 ( #4,275 of 2,330,051 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes