Spatial certainty : Feeling is the truth

In Spatial senses. London: Routleged (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A common sense view is illustrated by Doubting Thomas, and surfaces in many philosophical and psychological writings : Touching is better than seeing. But can we make sense of this privilege? We rule out that it could mean that touch is more informative than vision, more ‘objective’ or more directly in contact with reality. Instead, we propose that touch offers not a perceptual, but a metacognitive advantage: touch is not more objective than vision but rather provides comparatively higher subjective certainty.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pain and Touch.Frédérique de Vignemont - 2017 - The Monist 100 (4):465-477.
What is Touch?Matthew Ratcliffe - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):413 - 432.
Touch Without Touching.Matthew Fulkerson - 2012 - Philosophers' Imprint 12.
The Chemical Senses.Barry C. Smith - 2015 - In Mohan Matthen (ed.), The Oxford Handbook to Philosophy of Perception. New York, NY, USA: pp. 314-353.
Kant on the Phenomenology of Touch and Vision.Gary Hatfield - 2014 - In Alix Cohen (ed.), Kant's Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 38–56.
A Tour of the Senses.Carolyn Korsmeyer - 2019 - British Journal of Aesthetics 59 (4):357-371.


Added to PP

267 (#76,852)

6 months
98 (#47,026)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ophelia Deroy
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations