Analysis 80 (3):514-533 (2020)

Authors
Louis deRosset
University of Vermont
Abstract
In Objects: Nothing Out of the Ordinary, Daniel Z. Korman defends a view he calls conservatism. Conservatives hold that there are ordinary objects, but no extraordinary objects. But Korman never explicitly characterizes what would qualify an object as ordinary in the relevant sense. We have some paradigm cases of ordinary objects, including tables, dogs, and trees; and we have some paradigm cases of extraordinary objects of sorts familiar from the philosophical literature. Here I attempt to fill this gap, surveying a number of attempts to characterize the commitments of conservatism. All fail. In particular, no specification of what it takes for an object to be ordinary is both plausible and consistent with the conservative verdicts on the paradigms. I argue that this is no coincidence, since it turns out to be implausible in light of the results of settled science to deny the existence of one of Korman's paradigms of an extraordinary object. The upshot is that plausibility requires being a little more liberal than conservatism seems to allow.
Keywords Korman, Daniel Z.  Ontological Conservatism  Ontology  Ordinary Objects
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/anz055
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized.James Ladyman & Don Ross - 2007 - In James Ladyman, Don Ross, David Spurrett & John Collier (eds.), Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford University Press.
The Unreliability of Naive Introspection.Eric Schwitzgebel - 2006 - Philosophical Review 117 (2):245-273.
The Incoherence of Empiricism.George Bealer - 1992 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 66 (1):99-138.
The Right Stuff.Ned Markosian - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (4):665-687.
On What There Is.W. V. O. Quine - 1948 - Review of Metaphysics 2 (5):21-38.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Against Conservatism in Metaphysics.Maegan Fairchild & John Hawthorne - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:45-75.
Objects: Nothing Out of the Ordinary.Daniel Z. Korman - 2015 - Oxford University Press UK.
Existential Conservatism.David McPherson - 2019 - Philosophy 94 (3):383-407.
Conservatism in the 1990s, Our Common Purpose.John Roy Major, Carlton Club & Conservative Political Centre Britain) - 1993 - Carlton Club Political Committee in Association with the Conservative Political Centre.
What Is Conservatism?John Kekes - 1997 - Philosophy 72 (281):351 - 374.
Epistemic conservatism.Rodrigo Laera - 2013 - Filosofia Unisinos 14 (3):176-188.
Compassionate Phenomenal Conservatism.Michael Huemer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):30–55.
Phenomenal Conservatism and the Problem of Reflective Awareness.Luca Moretti - 2018 - American Philosophical Quarterly 55 (3):267-280.
Coherence Without Conservation.Georgi Gardiner - 2016 - Syndicate Philosophy 1:1-8.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-09-01

Total views
84 ( #124,340 of 2,438,713 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #42,970 of 2,438,713 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes