Witnesses of the body: medico-legal cases in seventeenth-century Rome

Studying early modern medico-legal testimonies can enrich our understanding of witnessing, the focus of much research in the history of science. Expert testimonies were well established in the Roman Canon law, but the sphere of competence of expert witnesses—one of the grounds on which seventeenth-century physicians claimed social and intellectual authority—troubled contemporary jurists. By reconstructing these debates in Counter Reformation Rome, and by placing in them the testimonies given by Paolo Zacchia, one of the founding fathers of legal medicine, this article discusses the epistemological and social issues surrounding the definition of expertise about the body in court. It shows how a high-ranking expert witness would define his competence versus the legal authority on the one hand, and versus lay and lower-status expert witnesses on the other. But it also explores the interactions between specific legal constraints, for example about eye witnessing, and the ways in which different kinds of witnesses would use the body as a source of evidence for testimony. While engaging with medico-legal issues including the ambiguous signs of childbirth and the visibility of pain, the article examines their meanings within Counter Reformation social controversies, including control over sexuality, imposition of discipline and the social status of physicians.Author Keywords: Legal medicine; Seventeenth-century Rome; Expert witnesses; Testimony; Body; Zacchia
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00005-5
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,150
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Testimony and Proof in Early-Modern England.R. W. Serjeantson - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (2):195-236.
Introduzione.[author unknown] - 1976 - Studi di Estetica 3:5-12.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Forensic Cultures in Historical Perspective: Technologies of Witness, Testimony, Judgment.Christopher Hamlin - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (1):4-15.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Secrets and Laws: Collected Essays in Law, Lives, and Literature.Melanie Williams - 2005 - [Distributed by] International Specialized Book Services.
Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson.Luc Bovens, Branden Fitelson, Stephan Hartmann & Josh Snyder - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (4):539-563.
Too Odd (Not) to Be True: A Reply to Olsson.Stephan Hartmann, Luc Bovens, Branden Fitelson & Josh Snyder - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (4):539-563.
The Medico-Legal Meaning of Voluntary.Vernon J. Bourke - 1990 - Modern Schoolman 67 (3):173-185.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

14 ( #326,537 of 2,152,218 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #162,767 of 2,152,218 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums