Environmental Values 28 (3):275-303 (2019)

Authors
Eric Desjardins
University of Western Ontario
Justin Donhauser
Bowling Green State University
Gillian Barker
University of Western Ontario
Abstract
While many recognise that rigid historical and compositional goals are inadequate in a world where climate and other global systems are undergoing unprecedented changes, others contend that promoting ecosystem services and functions encourages practices that can ultimately lower the bar of ecological management. These worries are foregrounded in discussions about 'novel ecosystems' (NEs), where some researchers and conservationists claim that NEs provide a license to trash nature as long as certain ecosystem services are provided. This criticism arises from what we call the 'anything goes problem' created by the release of historical conditions. After explaining the notion of NEs, we identify numerous substantive motivations for worrying about the 'anything goes problem' and then go on to show that the problem can be solved by correcting two mistaken assumptions. In short, we argue that the problem is a product of adopting an overly sparse functional perspective that assumes an unrealistically high degree of convergence in the trajectories of natural processes; our analysis illuminates why such assumptions are unwarranted. Further, we argue that adopting an appropriate ethical framework is essential to overcoming the 'anything goes problem', and suggest that a certain virtue-ethics conception of ecological management provides useful resources for framing and resolving the problem.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3197/096327119x15519764179791
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Politics of the Anthropocene.John S. Dryzek & Jonathan Pickering - 2018 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Limits of Anthropocene Narratives.Zoltán Boldizsár Simon - 2020 - European Journal of Social Theory 23 (2):184-199.
Historicity and Ecological Restoration.Eric Desjardins - 2015 - Biology and Philosophy 30 (1):77-98.
Ecological Trust: An Object-Oriented Perspective.Tom Sparrow - 2017 - Philosophy Today 61 (1):99-115.
Anthropocene and Art.Alberto Carrillo & May Zindel - 2018 - Glimpse 19:117-124.
Learning to Live in the Anthropocene: Our Children and Ourselves.Susan Laird - 2017 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 36 (3):265-282.
Ecological Intervention and Anthropocene Ethics.Simon Dalby - 2007 - Ethics and International Affairs 21 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-11

Total views
24 ( #457,206 of 2,454,556 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,188 of 2,454,556 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes