Grammar and Aesthetic Mechanismus. From Wittgenstein's Tractatus to the Lectures on Aesthetics

Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (1):17-34 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper takes distances from two influential images of Wittgenstein's philosophy: the image of a primarily ethical philosopher defended by the so-called «resolute» interpreters and that of an ascetically "analytical" philosopher transmitted by the standard interpretation. Instead of contrasting images (that of Wittgenstein as an "aesthetic" philosopher and that of the "ethical" Wittgenstein), this paper focuses on the analysis of the fractures and tensions characterizing not only the relationship between Wittgenstein's philosophy and aesthetics, but also the very style of Wittgenstein's thought. Addressing a specific issue from a conceptual and textual standpoint (the unity of Ethics and Aesthetics in the Tractatus) seems to the author to be a fruitful strategy that allows us not only to understand whether and how determinant and central the aesthetic problem is for Wittgenstein, but also to see how aesthetics itself can be radically reshaped through the filter offered by his thought. In the first place, then, it is clarified what the Tractatus claim that ethics and aesthetics «sind eins» might entail. Secondly, it is checked if and how the conceptual consistency of the «being one» of ethics and aesthetics is transformed during the 1930s, to the point that it requires a different configuration: the metamor¬phosis of the logical unity between the two conceptual fields into an analogical affinity. Analyzing this conceptual metamorphosis the paper considers also the idea of an asymmetry of the aesthetic over the ethical as already evident, despite appearances, in the 1929 Lecture on Ethics. This asymmetry is then developed focusing the image of grammatical mechanism with its degrees of freedom of which Wittgensteins writes from 1930. In connection with this image the author outlines finally the idea of an aesthetic mechanism arising from primitive reactions and strictly related with the genesis of language games

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,410

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein's Concepts for an Aesthetics: Judgment and Understanding of Form.Silvana Borutti - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (1):55-66.
Wittgenstein. Playing on the Edges of Language.Francesco Valagussa - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (1):291-305.
Aesthetics - Wittgenstein's Paradigm of Philosophy?Simo Säätelä - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (1):35-53.
Wittgenstein, Ethics and Aesthetics. The View from Eternity (Swansea Studies in Philosophy.[author unknown] - 1991 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 54 (3):556-558.
Towards a Wittgensteinian Aesthetics. Wollheim and the Analysis of Aesthetic Practices.Giovanni Matteucci - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (1):67-83.
Showing and Saying. An Aesthetic Difference.Vicente Sanfélix Vidarte - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (1):139-150.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-16

Downloads
66 (#266,416)

6 months
66 (#86,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fabrizio Desideri
Università degli Studi di Firenze

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Tractatus logico-philosophicus.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1922 - Filosoficky Casopis 52:336-341.
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1956 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 12 (1):109-110.
Philosophical grammar.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1974 - Oxford [Eng.]: Blackwell. Edited by Rush Rhees.
Philosophical remarks.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1975 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Rush Rhees.

View all 15 references / Add more references