Dialectica 60 (4):397–409 (2006)
There are certain metaphysically interesting arguments ‘from vagueness’, for unrestricted mereological composition and for four-dimensionalism, which involve a claim to the effect that idioms for unrestricted quantification are precise. An elaboration of Lewis’ argument for this claim, which assumes the view of vagueness as semantic indecision, is presented. It is argued that the argument also works according to other views on the nature of vagueness, which also require for an expression to be vague that there are different admissible alternatives of the relevant sort, such as epistemicism, as defended by Williamson. Recent attempts to resist the argument are discussed and rejected.
|Keywords||vagueness everything quantification|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time.Theodore Sider - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Unrestricted Composition and Restricted Quantification.Daniel Z. Korman - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 140 (3):319-334.
Similar books and articles
On Vagueness, 4d and Diachronic Universalism.Yuri Balashov - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (4):523 – 531.
Can Vagueness Cut Out at Any Order?Anna Mahtani - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):499 – 508.
Endurantism, Diachronic Vagueness and the Problem of the Many.By Kristie Miller - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (2):242–253.
Vagueness : A Statistical Epistemicist Approach.Jiri Benovsky - 2011 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy (3):97-112.
Universalism, Four Dimensionalism, and Vagueness.Hud Hudson - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):547-560.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #105,765 of 2,163,620 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,991 of 2,163,620 )
How can I increase my downloads?