In Michiru Nagatsu & Attilia Ruzzene (eds.), Contemporary Philosophy and Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue. New York: pp. 39-57 (2019)

C. Tyler DesRoches
Arizona State University
Stephen Andrew Inkpen
Harvard University
Since Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), historians and philosophers of science have paid increasing attention to the implications of disciplinarity. In this chapter we consider restrictions posed to interdisciplinary exchange between ecology and economics that result from a particular kind of commitment to the ideal of disciplinary purity, that is, that each discipline is defined by an appropriate, unique set of objects, methods, theories, and aims. We argue that, when it comes to the objects of study in ecology and economics, ideas of disciplinary purity have been underwritten by the artificial-natural distinction. We then problematize this distinction, and thus disciplinary purity, both conceptually and empirically. Conceptually, the distinction is no longer tenable. Empirically, recent interdisciplinary research has shown the epistemological and policy-oriented benefits of dealing with models which explicitly link anthropogenic (i.e., “artificial”) and non-anthropogenic factors (i.e., “natural”). We conclude that, in the current age of the Anthropocene, it is to be expected that without interdisciplinary exchange, ecology and economics may relinquish global relevance because the distinct and separate systems to which each “pure” science was originally made to apply will only diminish over time.
Keywords Philosophy of Science  Philosophy of Social Science  Interdisciplinary Science  Economics  Ecology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Economics a Natural Science?Julie A. Nelson - 2005 - Cosmos and History : The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 1 (2):261-269.
Is EconomIcs a natural scIEncE?Julie A. Nelson - 2004 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 71 (2):211-222.
Foreword.F. Dagfinn - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):399 – 401.
Regarding Nature: Industrialism and Deep Ecology.Andrew McLaughlin - 1993 - State University of New York Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
116 ( #99,670 of 2,499,389 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #42,740 of 2,499,389 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes