Virtues and Rights [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 46 (1):151-153 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Undoubtedly, Ewin's view of Thomas Hobbes's moral philosophy offers a fresh counterpart to most current analytical readings of Hobbes by recent American scholars, such as Gregory Kavka and Jean Hampton. Staying close to Hobbes's text, this Australian professor is continuously in debate with these two authors, criticizing their game theoretic reconstruction of Hobbesian philosophy. Ewin's main purpose seems to be the revival of Hobbes's reputation as a moral philosopher.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thomas Hobbes and the science of moral virtue.David Boonin - 1994 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Virtues and Rights. [REVIEW]María L. Lukac de Stier - 1992 - Review of Metaphysics 46 (1):151-153.
Liberal rights or/and confucian virtues?Seung-Hwan Lee - 1996 - Philosophy East and West 46 (3):367-379.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
4 (#1,599,757)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references