Du Châtelet and Descartes on the Role of Hypothesis and Metaphysics in Science

In Eileen O'Neill & Marcy Lascano (eds.), Feminism and the History of Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this chapter, I examine similarities and divergences between Du Châtelet and Descartes on their endorsement of the use of hypotheses in science, using the work of Condillac to locate them in his scheme of systematizers. I conclude that, while Du Châtelet is still clearly a natural philosopher, as opposed to modern scientist, her conception of hypotheses is considerably more modern than is Descartes’, a difference that finds its roots in their divergence on the nature of first principles.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descartes' Philosophy of Nature.Abubaker Ibrahim Tallue - 1984 - Dissertation, Tulane University
Emilie du Châtelet's Institutions de physique as a document in the history of French Newtonianism.Sarah Hutton - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (3):515-531.
An Essay on the Metaphysics of Descartes.Marthinus Versfeld - 1940 - Port Washington, N.Y., Kennikat Press.
Reason, Nature, and God in Descartes.Gary Hatfield - 1993 - In Stephen Voss (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy and Science of Rene Descartes. Oxford University Press. pp. 259–287.
The Relevance of Descartes's Philosophy for Modern Philosophy of Science.Gerd Buchdahl - 1963 - British Journal for the History of Science 1 (3):227-249.
Cartesian truth.Thomas C. Vinci - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy in Descartes and Newton.Andrew Janiak - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (3):403-417.


Added to PP

458 (#26,344)

6 months
54 (#31,976)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karen Detlefsen
University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Metaphysics and the new science.Gary Hatfield - 1990 - In David Lindberg & Robert Westman (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. by and (Cambridge:. Cambridge University Press. pp. 93–166.
Hypotheses.Desmond M. Clarke - 2011 - In Desmond M. Clarke & Catherine Wilson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. Oxford University Press.
The Physical Theory of Leibniz.George Gale - 1970 - Studia Leibnitiana 2 (2):114 - 127.

Add more references