Reconciling Rigor and Intuition

Erkenntnis 86 (6):1783-1802 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Criteria of acceptability for mathematical proofs are field-dependent. In topology, though not in most other domains, it is sometimes acceptable to appeal to visual intuition to support inferential steps. In previous work :829–842, 2014; Lolli, Panza, Venturi From logic to practice, Springer, Berlin, 2015; Larvor Mathematical cultures, Springer, Berlin, 2016) my co-author and I aimed at spelling out how topological proofs work on their own terms, without appealing to formal proofs which might be associated with them. In this article, I address two criticisms that have been raised in Tatton-Brown against our approach: that it leads to a form of relativism according to which validity is equated with social agreement and that it implies an antiformalizability thesis according to which it is not the case that all rigorous mathematical proofs can be formalized. I reject both criticisms and suggest that our previous case studies provide insight into the plausibility of two related but quite different theses.

Similar books and articles

Mathematical rigor and proof.Yacin Hamami - 2022 - Review of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):409-449.
The nature of the topological intuition.L. B. Sultanova - 2016 - Liberal Arts in Russia 5 (1):14.
An Inquiry into the Practice of Proving in Low-Dimensional Topology.Silvia De Toffoli & Valeria Giardino - 2015 - In Gabriele Lolli, Giorgio Venturi & Marco Panza (eds.), From Logic to Practice. Zurich, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. pp. 315-336.
Proof, rigour and informality : a virtue account of mathematical knowledge.Fenner Stanley Tanswell - 2016 - St Andrews Research Repository Philosophy Dissertations.
How to think about informal proofs.Brendan Larvor - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):715-730.
Beth, Kant et l'intuition mathématique.Jacques Dubucs - 1998 - Philosophia Scientiae 3 (4):93-134.
Prototype Proofs in Type Theory.Giuseppe Longo - 2000 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 46 (2):257-266.
Kitcher, Mathematical Intuition, and Experience.Mark McEvoy - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (2):227-237.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-22

Downloads
830 (#15,598)

6 months
194 (#10,772)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Silvia De Toffoli
University School of Advanced Studies IUSS Pavia

References found in this work

Mathematical Knowledge and the Interplay of Practices.José Ferreirós - 2015 - Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.
Mathematical rigor and proof.Yacin Hamami - 2022 - Review of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):409-449.
Proofs and refutations (IV).I. Lakatos - 1963 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14 (56):296-342.
Why Do We Prove Theorems?Yehuda Rav - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (1):5-41.

View all 25 references / Add more references